Mr. McCallister, like all polygraphers you are a fraud and operate a fradulent machine.  

In my opinion, which does not require a presumption of innocence, you are also a sexual deviat.  This world will be a better place when you are back in jail.

To:  Mr. Brown

I am a past full member of:

American Polygraph Association (APA)
Florida Polygraph Association (FPA)
American Association of Police Polygraphists (AAPP)

I am a current member of the American Society for Testing
& Matrerials.  For the past twelve years they have been setting the professional standards for the polygraph profession. Standardization is their goal.  I also subscribe to and follow the APA standards of practice. 

I was formally trained 1983, by the late, Dr. William J. Yankee, former director of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DoDPI), Now called the Defense Academy for Credibility Assesment (DACA).

To: Bill_Brown
I would like to be a member of Professional Organizations, but until my rights are restored, I must wait.  Even then there is no guarantee this will ever happen.

I sometimes attend seminars as a guest of a member.  This is the only way I can stay on top of new developments in the profession. ASTM is the only organization I can join, right now.

As-far-as advancing my knowledge, I learn a lot from sites such as this.

William McCallister

Cybercraft,

Until yesterday, this forum blocked IP addresses that are included in StopForumSpam.com's database. We blocked such IPs in an effort to counter Xrumer-generated forum spam.

As it turns out, many of the IPs in StopForumSpam.com's database are Tor exit nodes. This became evident when testing forum access through the Tails live CD, which I posted about yesterday.

We have adopted an alternative method of countering XRumer and all IP blocks were lifted yesterday (24 January 2012).

2007 New Florida Law Revision
House Bill 989 (Ch. 2007-129): Victims; Sexual Offenses; Polygraph; HIV; Courts; Forensic Physical Examinations; Attorney General

Per revisions to F.S. 960.001, provides that no alleged victim of a sexual battery shall be required to take a polygraph examination or other truth-telling device as a condition of proceeding with an investigation.  Such a refusal by the alleged victim shall not preclude further investigation of the alleged offence.  IN addition, new language in the same section provides that upon request by the victim or the victim's parent, guardian, or lawful representative, a victim advocate shall be present at the forensic examination of the alleged victim.  A change to F.S. 960.28 requires that the initial forensic examination of the alleged victim shall be paid for by the Crime Vicitim's Services Office of the Attorney General.  Also amends F.S. 960.003 to require that, upon court order, any person charged with certain offenses involving the transmission of bodily fluids shall undergo HIV testing within 48 hours of such court order.

Effective Date: July 1, 2007.

........


No wonder we have a significant increase in alleged sexual abuse allegations.

William McCallister

Bill_Brown wrote on Apr 1^st, 2012 at 5:32pm:


Why are polygraphs traumadic?

Bill_Brown wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2012 at 5:47pm:


Why wouldnt the same be true for a witness if the trauma is reliving the event, and not the polygraph interrogation itself?