AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - infidelity polygraph test

infidelity polygraph test

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.

Return To:

Select where you would like to return to after posting.

jessica New User Offline Posts: 1 Joined: Dec 16^th, 2009	infidelity polygraph test Dec 16^th, 2009 at 7:46pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Hi, my partner took a polygraph test after i suspected him of having an affair. He was asked 3 questions and the test concluded no deception detected to all three questions. However, the result of the 1st question automatically answered questions 2 and 3 also. Should the tester have asked question 1 only? Also, The tester told him after the test that he had done well !! and that there had to be significant changes for there to be deception detected. Is this true? I still suspect my partner had an affair and am baffled that he passed this test. How easy would it be to pass one of these tests if you did no homework on how to pass but were lying?


	IP Logged

T.M. Cullen God Member Offline Posts: 858 Location: Hawaii Joined: Dec 5^th, 2007 Gender:	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #1 - Dec 17^th, 2009 at 2:35am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	You are operating under the common yet false assumption that polygraphs can detect deception. It can't. Liars can pass, and the truthful can fail. Most people coming to this website looking for answers took the polygraph, told the truth, but failed. If you suspect your partner of infidelity, why are you relying on a pseudo science to get to the truth? TC

	"There is no direct and unequivocal connection between lying and these physiological states of arousal...(referring to polygraph)." Dr. Phil Zimbardo, Phd, Standford University
	IP Logged

Samoset New User Offline Posts: 18 Joined: Jun 16^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #2 - Dec 17^th, 2009 at 4:21pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	TC is correct about this. If you really do suspect infidelity, just hire a private investigator to trail your partner's movements. Just have the person trail the partner and see where they go. That would be the best and most economical way to resolve this.


	IP Logged

Katelyn Sack User Offline Posts: 31 Joined: Aug 6^th, 2009	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #3 - Dec 17^th, 2009 at 5:22pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	@ Samoset: Covert surveillance of a partner is stalking. http://womenscenter.virginia.edu/sdvs/stalking/definition.htm If you're in a relationship where you can't control your partner's every movement, and this bothers you... Please do the partner a favor and dump him.


	WWW IP Logged

Samoset New User Offline Posts: 18 Joined: Jun 16^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #4 - Dec 17^th, 2009 at 5:46pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Katelyn Sack wrote on Dec 17^th, 2009 at 5:22pm: @ Samoset: Covert surveillance of a partner is stalking. http://womenscenter.virginia.edu/sdvs/stalking/definition.htm If you're in a relationship where you can't control your partner's every movement, and this bothers you... Please do the partner a favor and dump him. Miss Sack, I did not mean it that way. I never thought of it like that. I just meant for the investigator to keep an eye on the partner. They don't even have to go into emails or texts as those can be taken out of context. But yes, if they are in a relationship like that, then a person can always get out of it by dumping the other one.


	IP Logged

pailryder Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 441 Joined: Jun 5^th, 2006	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #5 - Dec 17^th, 2009 at 8:59pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	So. a woman who suspects she is a victim of a cheating husband and arranges for a private detective to follow him should be jailed for stalking?

	No good social purpose can be served by inventing ways of beating the lie detector or deceiving polygraphers. David Thoreson Lykken
	IP Logged

BBernie User Offline Posts: 38 Location: Southern U.S. Joined: Sep 30^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #6 - Dec 18^th, 2009 at 2:30am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	pailryder wrote on Dec 17^th, 2009 at 8:59pm: So. a woman who suspects she is a victim of a cheating husband and arranges for a private detective to follow him should be jailed for stalking? I think the idea is that if you can't trust your partner anymore then its game over! A relationship is totally based on trust. Others might disagree and say something else...I don't know what else? Sex, common interests? infatuation? Whatever. If you have to resort to hiring a PI or a polygraph then its time to beat feet. I would at least.


	IP Logged

Sergeant1107 God Member Offline Posts: 730 Location: Connecticut, USA Joined: May 21^st, 2005 Gender:	Re: infidelity polygraph test Reply #8 - Dec 19^th, 2009 at 12:52am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Hiring a private detective to follow your partner does not fit any legal definition of stalking. It doesn't even fit the definition of stalking to which Miss Sack included a link.

	Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.
	IP Logged