Normal Topic all the bad advice out there (Read 3888 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box advice for all
Guest


all the bad advice out there
Jul 1st, 2008 at 8:52am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Just so there is at least one positive post on this site.  I want to say that I had a very positive experience with my poly.  I did it for the secret service and passed.  The questions were straight foward and the examiner was polite and helpful.  So for all of you who are thinking of employing countermeasures DON'T I did not and I still passed.  If you try them and fail rest assured it is likely because you employed countermeasures.  Again just go in, be calm, listen to the instructions, and relax.  Trust me even those of us with some infractions in our past can "beat the box"
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6218
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: all the bad advice out there
Reply #1 - Jul 1st, 2008 at 9:16am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
If your advice to "just go in, be calm, listen to the instructions, and relax" (while answering the relevant questions truthfully) -- which is, incidentally, the standard advice given by polygraph operators -- guaranteed that one would pass the polygraph, then this website would not exist. I followed your advice twice while sitting for law enforcement pre-employment polygraph examinations. The first time I was falsely accused of deception, and the second time I was falsely accused of employing countermeasures. (I didn't even know what polygraph countermeasures are at the time.) Many others have had similar experiences:

https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml

Polygraph countermeasures provide truthful examinees with a means of protecting themselves against the very serious risk of a false positive outcome, and it is for this reason that we provide detailed information about them in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (1 mb PDF):

https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

We encourage readers may make their own, informed judgments about whether to use countermeasures.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box notguilty1
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 300
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2008
Re: all the bad advice out there
Reply #2 - Jul 1st, 2008 at 3:28pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
Just so there is at least one positive post on this site.  I want to say that I had a very positive experience with my poly.  I did it for the secret service and passed.  The questions were straight foward and the examiner was polite and helpful.  So for all of you who are thinking of employing countermeasures DON'T I did not and I still passed.  If you try them and fail rest assured it is likely because you employed countermeasures.  Again just go in, be calm, listen to the instructions, and relax.  Trust me even those of us with some infractions in our past can "beat the box"



Your experience and advise because of it is no more accurate than me telling you that you can infact predict the outcome of a coin toss because I just happened to call it and was right.
Unfortunaltly, the test is no "test" at all and just a way to interrogate a subject post test or in some cases pre test.
I am glad the ploy went your way and that you may move on to a rewarding carrier in secret service. However don't kid yourself .... they are not relying on the poly to establish your worthiness for the job. Good luck
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box T.M. Cullen
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 858
Location: Hawaii
Joined: Dec 5th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: all the bad advice out there
Reply #3 - Jul 1st, 2008 at 9:13pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Advice for All,

I am very confident in the whole process.  There is a 86-98% accuracy rate.  Pretty hard to beat.  I am so confident in fact, that I am forcing my wife to take the test.  I suspect she has been receiving "special packages" from the mail man.  I am willing to let the TEST results determine the future status of our marriage.  Isn't science just wonderful!  All she has to do is go in there and relax and tell the truth.

Unfortunately, some of the knuckleheads on this board have been swayed by the propaganda put out by those know-nothings at the National Academy of Sciences.   Also, they actually believe they were tested FALSE POSITIVE on the polygraph.  Well, they may THINK they were telling the truth, but how could that be if they failed the test?  How do they really KNOW they were telling the truth without scientific verification?  Unless of course, you are willing to risk trusting the faculties of your own mind over a scroll of graph paper!

If a doctor measures your temperature, and tells you you have a 103 fever, yet you claim you have no fever, who would you believe?  And let there be no doubt, the results measured by a polygraph device are just as accurate as the results from a thermometer.   If your autonomic nervous system reacts while answering a question, there is only a 2% chance you are not lying.  Ask any polygrapher!

BTW, If you don't believe the above, then you must be a child molester or working for Al Qaeda!

TC
« Last Edit: Jul 1st, 2008 at 9:34pm by T.M. Cullen »  

"There is no direct and unequivocal connection between lying and these physiological states of arousal...(referring to polygraph)."

Dr. Phil Zimbardo, Phd, Standford University
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Sergeant1107
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 730
Location: Connecticut, USA
Joined: May 21st, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: all the bad advice out there
Reply #4 - Jul 2nd, 2008 at 1:46am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
Just so there is at least one positive post on this site.  I want to say that I had a very positive experience with my poly.  I did it for the secret service and passed.  The questions were straight foward and the examiner was polite and helpful.  So for all of you who are thinking of employing countermeasures DON'T I did not and I still passed.  If you try them and fail rest assured it is likely because you employed countermeasures.  Again just go in, be calm, listen to the instructions, and relax.  Trust me even those of us with some infractions in our past can "beat the box"


If being calm, listening to the instructions, and relaxing (not to mention telling the truth), were the only requirements for passing a polygraph I would have passed all four instead of failing the first three.

If you walked into a casino and dropped a silver dollar in the nearest one-armed bandit and won, would you consider it valid advice to say, "To win money at slots, just relax, go the first machine you see, drop in a dollar and pull the lever."

People who follow your advice will undoubtedly pass some of the time.  They will also fail some of the time.  The percentages of each are debatable, but no one can claim that either is zero.  If the polygraph was a worthwhile detector of deception a subject would be able to pass by telling the truth.  That simply doesn't happen often enough to justify any faith in the polygraph as a detector of deception.
  

Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box T.M. Cullen
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 858
Location: Hawaii
Joined: Dec 5th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: all the bad advice out there
Reply #5 - Jul 2nd, 2008 at 8:16am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
If you try them [countermeasures] and fail, rest assured it is likely because you employed countermeasures.


Well, that has been debated here ad barfeaum.   

On the one hand, polygraphers claim they can detect the employment of countermeasures, with their magic "woopie cushions"...etc.  On the other hand, they claim the employment of CMs is a total waste of time and not likely fool them.

So why, then, are polygraphers so preoccupied with detecting something that they claim can not "trick" them and foil the process?

Why?  Because if applied correctly, they probably do work, which is why polygraphers are so eager to know if they are being used against them.  OTOH, they have a vested public relations interest in discouraging the use of CMs by claiming they simply don't work.

Please feel free to reply.  We encourage open debate from all sides here.

TC



  

"There is no direct and unequivocal connection between lying and these physiological states of arousal...(referring to polygraph)."

Dr. Phil Zimbardo, Phd, Standford University
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
all the bad advice out there

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X