yankeedog wrote on Apr 30
th, 2008 at 11:10pm:
notguilty1 wrote on Apr 30
th, 2008 at 3:29am:
Hey Yankee,
The fact in your doctor case is that the doc correctly called the "death" by a gunshot wound!! He is a doctor not a cop.
No, you are misrepresenting the information which has been provided, which is not at all unusual.
You see my little friend, when you get caught, as you have just been, misrepresenting the truth, you are deemed dishonest or lacking in credibility. The doctor in the situation I described specifically said the victim had “two” gunshot wounds to the head, not “a” gunshot wound to the head. There is an obvious and distinctive difference. You do understand the difference between singular and plural, yes? The doctor was mistaken, but not deliberately or intentionally as you have been caught doing, and made an opinion based upon the evidence before him. But, he was still wrong in the end.
And no, we don’t try to compare ourselves with doctors (but I do like the idea of the white lab coat – it could portray an aura of academic knowledge). We are a separate, respected profession. The analogies (analogy - a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based) are simply to provide an example so that people who are actually trying to learn something can understand. Just as an auto mechanic is a profession (they make mistakes, too). We could use them for analogies also.
And Sackett, you might not look good in white, but I sure do!!
Yankee,
Your need to "catch people" is deep and if you need to extend that to your off time, have fun. Just like the silly Polygraph test I failed cost me nothing except time, your on line "examination" has little effect on me or the truth regarding Polygraphs.
You may not compare yourself to a doctor but your friend Sackett does it all the time. As for the comparision you mentioned analogy -
a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based If you guys did start wearing lab coats that would be the only comparision to medical doctors!!
And your suggestion about using lab coats -
but I do like the idea of the white lab coat – it could portray an aura of academic knowledge I hope you woud enjoy the aura becasue thats the only thing that would bring "academic knowledge" to you guys.
Look Yankee I'll say it once again for you too.
If Polygraphs worked you and Sackett would have no need to come here and convince the viewers that your non-science is valid.
Show me a web site where doctors go to convince people that thier science is valid...... It doesn't exsist. Why?? Because you need to do what you can to limit the damage that GM, this site and posters who have the drive to come here and expose what you do!
So, go ahead and do what you do. There are many unsuspecting victims out there. But, they will seek information just look at the number of "views" on this site.
Your science is already insignificant in a court of law ..... Why??? Because studies have shown it to be UNRELIABLE.
Just because your machine says "he's lying" dosen't make it so even when he confesses since there have been many cases where a examinee has confessed in a post failed Poly interogation only to be proven innocent by other means later. So much for Polygraphs.
But you know what Yankee you need not worry if Sackett is right there are only 5-6 of us "anti whiners" out there
Pages: 
I've always wanted to be in law enforcement... (Read 45458 times)
