Painful, Painful
  You want me to go over written analysis? It's kind of an interesting subject. I use it as a tool for interview's, and law enforcement questioning. Some people use the Polygraph, some use VSA's, I enjoy reading words. But like anything else, it's a tool to see if there are irregularities. It's the same with an interview. I look for changes, wording, the number of lines in a statement. I color code etc etc. It's basic, yet there can be a lot of thought process behind it. Some words in a statement can lead a LEO to think a crime has been committed, and therefore will work on a specific sentence, or reevaluate how to conduct the questioning. 
You used 
I have not 
I never have
then you wrote 
I haven't
It's been proven that when a suspect of a crime, or someone suspected of deceipt will draw out there answers, then someone who is innocent. It's the way we think.
For example: 
Someone suspected of murder who could be innocent when asked if he/she killed some one might say.
I didn't do it, or it wasn't me
Someone who could be guilty would say
I did not do it, or it was not me.
There are other factors to determine in a statement, like grammar, punctuation, and spelling (I'm not saying I'm perfect in this area, since I'm far from it), but it does help us out in the long run. Remember, I'm not a fan of pre screening Poly's. But like other tool's it's awesome for criminal investigations.    


after reading your initial post. I'd be wary of anyone who writes, or tells me he is a good (strong)Christian, or extremly religous. For me, it's like your trying to convince me quickly that your a good person. Most investigators just want to know what has happened, and need facts, not opinions. It could also cause a skeptic to dig digger, and use their expierence with the matter for a more negative result. Hate to say it this way, but President's, Dictators, and a lot of negative individuals themselves use the religious game...  

Christians threw a lot of good (innocent) people into the Lions den.

I suppose in those days, there were the pro and anti "lion treatment' groups.

The 'pro' camp undoubtedly said, " It works well. It's all we've got right now and anyway we know that at least half those bastards we tossed in last week were anti-christ. We know that for sure because
when we read their entrails, it was there for all to see, written in the entrails."

Further posts to this message thread should substantially address the topics raised by the originator thereof.