Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Locked Topic Another poly folly, (or so it appears). (Read 1724 times)
nopolycop
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 383
Joined: Oct 20th, 2007
Another poly folly, (or so it appears).
Nov 14th, 2007 at 4:03am
 
It appears some spychick who went to work for the FBI 8 years ago, (had to take a polyto get hired) and then the CIA 4  years ago (assuming another poly) has now been discovered to be a spy.  Isn't the poly supposed to weed out these types?
  

"Although the degree of reliability of polygraph evidence may depend upon a variety of identifiable factors, there is simply no way to know in a particular case whether a polygraph examiner's Conclusion is accurate, because certain doubts and uncertainties plague even the best polygraph exams."  (Justice Clarence Thomas writing in United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303, 118 S.Ct. 1261, 140 L.Ed.2d 413, 1998.)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6122
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: Another poly folly, (or so it appears).
Reply #1 - Nov 14th, 2007 at 10:08am
 
The employee involved, Nada Nadim Prouty, has not been accused of espionage against the United States. However the Prouty case does seem to be yet another failure of polygraph screening. See:

https://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=1195034414

Comments on the Prouty case should be directed to the above thread. This one has been closed.
  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint