Barry_C wrote on Nov 20^th, 2007 at 2:32pm:


Good Boy Noddy. You fetched the bone. Good Boy Noddy.

Here's some more - you're on the clock..... go  for it:

Refer: www.mentalfloss.com
"A stupid or silly person named NoodleNush a dolt. A person named CarryB whose mental acumen is well below par. A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under supervision. Namely CarryB. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive, except if used correctly."

Go Boy.

Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


RE: POLYGRAPH TESTS
Refer Letter elsewhere on this site by:

John Furedy, Emeritus Professor of Psychology
University of Toronto
Sydney, Australia 

"The Polygraph “Test” Is Not A Test"

"What one would think if one heard that IQ tests “varied among agencies”. Wouldn’t one conclude that these so-called tests were not tests at all, but rather unstandardized interviews where IQ “testers” arrived at their scores by having a conversation with the examinee to determine the examinee’s IQ?  Why is it that even North American scientists commonly accept the polygraph as a “test”, and then go on to argue about validity, whereas the argument about validity cannot even begin if one is not dealing with a test.
It would be bad enough if faith in these polygraph “tests” were confined to talk show hosts like Dr. Phil, who deal with personal problems.  What is worse is that national security depends on this peculiarly North American superstitious flight of technological fancy."