Nonombre,

Thanks for your good wishes. I am going to try and do a deal with amazon
iro sole distribution rights and see if they will absorb some of the
printing / publishing costs, base don sales of my previous book.

I wrote a book previously. It sold well. Thought I would use the same avenue
again as the % split was very fair. But, the old crowd changed hands and so
I have to start knocking on doors all over again.

This time around I want to go for a bigger market.

I think that door kicking must have made you a HBP patient.
Shit. every next time you kick a door it could be your last time.
Your family must have been very pleased when you gave that one up.

If you post from your work place and your Identity is known there, then I would understand 
that you cannot answer my next question with sincerity. 

Q: Dont you often admit to yourself that this technology has less than desirable accuracy..?

If you dont answer.....no sweat.

Nonombre,

You can polygraph politicians !! Not only would I openly support you, I would even donate money for that, but I do believe you would have open support from all sides on this debate. When politicians and lawyers lips are moving they are lying. So on that premise, it could be a win-win for all concerned. Just a thought !! 

Regards !!!

yea... so... I didnt really follow most of the procedures explained... however i was able to use the tack in the shoe trick.  To say the least my test came back inconclusive, and the examiner said it was more on the truthful side than deceptive.  Basically he went through the same questionare of 10 questions about 5 times.  He went the through the first set and what I didnt was push on the tack to keep my heart elavated and tried to keep a steady breating rate, completely concious of my breating rate... I kept it slow and steady.  Next he the stim test i believe is what it was called.... it was the numbers test...  He told me to pick a number between 2 - 9. I picked 7,  he told me lie on that number.  So when he went thru the numbers I let off the tack at numbers 2-6, when he wanted me to lie on number 7 I pushed on the tack to make my heart rate go up, let off the tack on numbers 8-9.  After that he did the 10 question set questionare.   In which what I was hoping, I provided a false "lie" on his chart (when i pressed on the tack on the number 7 during the stim test).  I proceeded to Press on the tack the whole time during the questionare, when I answered the question I let off the tack. I mixed it u a little as I really wasnt sure what I was doing... So afterawhile I just pressed on the tack trying to raise my heartrate DURING when the question  was asked,  I answered then let off tack.  I stepped on the tack... and raised my heartrate as soon as he begin the next question.  All the while I kept my breathing rate steady.  I think it worked as he said my results were inconclusive and more on the truthful side.  What do you guys think?  Did I do it right?  Well I know it worked... but I would like to perfect it more... as I may have more polygraphs latter.... In fact I think the polygrapher was mad, cuz he was like and I quote, " You'll probably be seeing me later down the road."

I think the 'tack in shoe' tactic is about the dumbest ever.
I mean, what is the examiner supposed to think when subjects come limping into
the examination room. If the tack isnt making contact when they walk, then they
basically have no chance to make it work later in the test - any subject doing the
'foot jive' would automatically give themselves away.

Control and selective manipulation of breathing, coupled with distracted focus
is the way to go....but one does need a fair amount of IQ to get it right.

I wonder if there's a market for an 'anti-poly wonder tack'.
Works by remote control of a switch linked to the sphincter.
Activating yr sphincter creates 1 CM response while the electric tack shocks the 
hell out of you - sending your GSR soaring.

Just a thought. Use it. Dont use it.

Quote:



Good One..!!!!
Damn. I wish I had said that.

On a different tack however..(haha) I am somewhat amused by the crop of of people visiting this site,
that have dodgy backgrounds ( " I did some stuff, but i'm law abiding now" ) and whom want to become
law enforcement officers...? Go figure.

I wonder if anyone has ever undertaken any psychological research into why people (to differing degrees) with criminal history become so hell bent on becoming Cops. Do you think that they have
a different perception of what the uniform stands for - as compared to normal people?

Do they perceive the uniform as a means to commit criminal acts without the usual fear of being apprehended ? 

Do they perceive cops as being criminals with sponsored clothing ?

Reading world news, it seems to be a common thread running through many societies.

Time to muse.

Hi, I more or less agree with your viewpoint. It is a subject that a few people could debate, with only slightly differing viewpoints, yet for hours on end.

I come from a dysfunctional family background. My father was a rogue.
looking back, i am convinced that he was a sociopath. He defied rules ans
laws; lived by his own credo and pretty much justified eveything that he
did. 

Which makes me an exception to the rule. I had no positive role models.
We used to move home at midnight. Not just changing neighbourhoods -
we used to move hundreds of miles at a time.

I was poorly educated, until I left home at age 16 and went my own way. 
I put myself through college. Held down decent jobs. Attended further learning 
courses. Opened my own businesses, made profit, sold and moved on.
I found my niche in investigation - I guess I always had an innate knack to
'read' people. Fraud investigation led me to the DOD industry. Some years
back I invested with a property club and can now indulge myself somewhat.

My father really led a miserable life. He married a woman that gave him back
all his BS in spades.

And now I have 2 spoiled brats that pretty much fit your story.

Fun, isn't it...?