palerider wrote on May 20
th, 2007 at 2:18pm:
Noombre makes a good point. Posting my countermeasure charts will elicit one thing, and one thing only. George and the rest of the gang here on gilligans island will claim that the countermeasures are poor---and of course I would agree.
So post the charts and explain why the countermeasures are poor. I am prepared to change my views regarding the advisability of using polygraph countermeasures, and I know precisely what it would take to so persuade me:
evidence. Thus far, the polygraph community has offered none. Why don't you be the first?
Quote:Eos said: "And lets be honest here, a good chess player never reveals winning moves or strategies. "
I can't argue with you there----except that the site claims to offer winning strategies and yet only offers anonymous stories of success at the game.
Wrong. The countermeasure strategies described in Chapter 4 of
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector are not based on "anonymous stories of success at the game." They are based on the polygraph literature, again, with references that skeptical readers may check for themselves.
Quote:If you are the Bobby Fisher of polygraph, than show us a real match through freedom of info act requests.
Specifically what files do you suggest that we request under the Freedom of Information Act?
Quote:If George was able to acquire the DOD's new scoring criteria only months after internal release, than why can't George supply ---with his resources and turncoats----his own countermeasure charts (graphic success stories.) Isn't it ironic that you nay sayers are always making claims---such as getting your false negatives--and that you have offered not a shred of proof? Can't one of you guys offer your own successful countermeasures rather than imploring an examiner to offer unsuccessful ones? Essentially, this site serves as a "miracle diet"---only without a single picture of the before and after bikini pics. I'm afraid that Antipolygraph.org is no longer the little cult site---in that you have to provide your readership with the pudding. Posters like Eosjupiter claim to have lost 200lbs off the George M. site and I would just like to see a picture of such an outlandish claim ---rather than resorting to me having to post pics of your fat-assed, unsuccessful readership's failures---figuratively speaking. It's simple. This site claims to have a successful recipe to beat the test. Show your readership those successes-------successes made directly as a result of TLBTLD.
First, I must strongly disagree with your characterization of those who have provided information to AntiPolygraph.org as being "turncoats." Truth-telling in the public interest is patriotic.
As for why we don't post the polygraph charts of those who have successfully employed countermeasures: when a person does successfully employ polygraph countermeasures,
the polygraph examiner doesn't know it. So how would we obtain the charts?!
Quote:I saw a tattered antipolygraph.org bumper sticker on the back of a pizza delivery car. No doubt another success story. I wonder if he was also former special forces----or maybe he was just digithead.
Sure you did... While our bumber stickers may fade with age, they are made of durable vinyl and not prone to tattering:
Quote:Excuse me while I test pediphiles, your #1 fans. What would your father think George?
It is frightening to think that a charlatan with a polygraph machine such as yourself who doesn't even know how to spell "pedophile" would be making decisions regarding such persons' compliance or non-compliance with the terms of their probation/parole.