fatman1955 wrote on Aug 5
th, 2006 at 6:28pm:
George, first of all I have the utmost respect for your views and applauded your personal campaign to abolish the polygraph.
Thank you for your kind words. I have indeed put a great deal of time and effort into promoting polygraph reform, but I'm hardly alone in this, and there are many to whom great credit is due.
Quote:The only problem with your theory is the general public really does not care. Unless you have been a victim and know what goes on during the polygraph test, I would speculate that the general public just does not care.
Agreed, but I don't perceive this as a "problem with my theory." I agree with you that the general public really doesn't care. But they generally don't care not only because they are not personally affected, but also because they are ill-informed (if not misinformed) about polygraphy. I think it is probably the case that most Americans are still under the false impression that polygraphy, while admittedly fallible, is somehow a valid, science-based technique for differentiating truth from deception, when in actuality, it's sheer pseudoscience.
Quote:Prior to my test I trusted the agency that administered my test. This organization has a very good reputation (most of the time). I am sure that all of us, to include yourself, had no idea we would be falsely accused of lying without being shown any evidence to prove it.
Roger that. But I think this only buttresses my argument that the most important area where we need to be working now is spreading public understanding of the fraud that is polygraphy.
Quote:If you want to stop unfair treatment of individuals legislation must come through amendment of the 1988 Employee Polygraph Protection Act (29 USC 22) and have Congress extend the protections of the 1988 Employee Polygraph Protection Act to all Americans. To do this your vehicle of change is through our elected officials. Changing Federal policy is not a very quick process. If everyone sent an individual letter to there Congressman/woman or State representative with sound proof of how unfair the polygraph is used to hire and maintain Federal employees maybe, just maybe, progress will be made to have all Americans treated equally.
Agreed! And I fully encourage all who have been victims of the polygraph to contact their elected representatives at both the federal and state levels. Unfortunately, however, experience shows that our elected representatives care less about what's right or wrong than they do about what's necessary to get elected/re-elected. Polygraph policy unfortunately ranks all too low on the priority list of most members of Congress and state legislatures.
So long as the public remains largely misinformed about polygraphy, publicly taking a stand against polygraph screening is going to hurt most candidates rather than help them, because they'll be credibly (albeit demagogically) attacked as somehow being "weak on security."
Quote:The problem as I see it, the government will side with what is best to protect the country. The old saying you may need to break a few eggs to make a good omelet may hold true. Unfortunately we, the victims of the polygraph are some of the few eggs!
I disagree. The government won't side with what is best to protect the country. The government will side with what is best to protect its own bureaucratic interests, which are all-too-frequently at odds with the interests of the American people.
Governmental reliance on the pseudoscience of polygraphy doesn't protect the interests of the American people. Rather it protects the interests of corrupt and incompetent government officials shirking accountability to the people they are supposed to serve.
Quote:My strategy has become stop feeling mad about what happened to me, because there are more stories worst than mine, and write every elected official I can find who has shown an interest in stopping the polygraph. I am currently writing a letter containing verified and credible proof identified in academic circles that shows the polygraph is unjust and presents a threat to Federal agencies preventing competent people from serving their country base on technology from the 1920s to every elected official I can find. I am confident there are at lease a few public officials who will understand and pursue this issue. There are a few listed on antipolygraph.org but I am not sure it this list is inclusive of current. It may mean using the media such as FOX News or CNN to get their attention. Unfortunately, the change may not help the ones, who have failed the polygraph unjustly, but those in the future may not have to endure what we had to go through.
I fully support your actions. Such efforts are indeed needed. But so long as the public continues to wrongly believe that the polygraph can detect lies, I fear that such efforts will bear little fruit. The elites of our society have known for decades that polygraphy is flapdoodle, but they continue to sanction it because a gullible and misinformed public continues to believe in this hocus pocus.
Quote:Kudos to antipolygraph.org for the wealth of information. The general public awareness maybe the vehicle for change, but the driver is our elected officials. Always remember those elected, can be unelected. Get out and vote in the next election and make sure those running know this is a topic of national security and an unjust hiring practice for Federal employees.
Amen. I agree that legislative action is necessary, and perhaps you've seen AntiPolygraph.org's proposed
Comprehensive Employee Polygraph Protection Act that would extend to
all Americans the protections afforded to most by the 1988 Employee Polygraph Protection Act.
Quote:Has your petition been sent to the President yet because I did sign it?
The petition has not yet been sent, but it will be well before President Bush leaves office.