After 2 years of mental preperation, the anal pucker technique and 100 mg of toprol, I beat the box. Thanks antipolygraph!

joeschmoe

nonombre is a polygrapher who thinks he has the deadwood on all CMs. However, he keeps asking questions on how people beats it. Evidently he is still learning and is trying to pick your brain on how you beat it. Then he can turn it on his next unsuspecting subject. Don't answer his questions.

Twoblock wrote on May 23^rd, 2006 at 1:51am:


Hey Twoblock,

Please explain to me how someone who tries to "beat" the polygraph can be a "unsuspecting subject?"

Seems to me to be a contradiction of terms.  In any case, I was honestly wondering what he lied about.  And by the way, I am always learning.  Aren't you?

Eos,

I skipped out for awhile.  The posts were just getting to insulting and people were attacking on form, not substance.  I am still not sure if I am back for good.  Let's just say I am sticking my toe in the water and hoping some shark doesn't bite it off...

Take Care,

Nonombre

nonombre quite clearly stated, "(not to give anything away)".

There is very little substance to joeschmoe's post and a 2 year prep time would lend itself to few examination subjects (with pre-employment being my number one suspect).  

Some consider being found truthful on an examination, even though they told the truth, "beating the box".  This can be from past experiences of failed employment efforts.

So, two simple "(not to give anything away)" questions I have for joeschmoe.

1.  Was it a specific issue or screening examination
    that you participated in?

2.  Did you lie to any of the relevant questions?

As a side note, I believe that Drew Richardson warned not to use this type of medication.  If this was a pre-employment examination, good luck on the drug screening examination.