Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic use in non crminal invetigations. (Read 2676 times)
New User

Posts: 1
Joined: Mar 30th, 2006
use in non crminal invetigations.
Mar 31st, 2006 at 2:46pm
Print Post  
Can anyone tell my why insurance invetigators are using this tactic. With all that i have been reading there seems to be a fairly high number of false positives. What is they use this tactic on someone with a stress disorder like say bipolar disorder. If this preson is stressed out just by the whole process can they really get an acurate reading.? Is voice stress the same as a lie detector and do they have the same false positive rates?
Back to top
IP Logged
God Member

Posts: 730
Location: Connecticut, USA
Joined: May 21st, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: use in non crminal invetigations.
Reply #1 - Apr 1st, 2006 at 4:48pm
Print Post  
The National Institute of Truth Verification, which markets the Computerized Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA), has admitted in a court filing that their device "is not capable of lie detection." John Tuohy reports this in an Indianapolis Star article titled, "Voice analyzers draw praise, flak." Here is the relevant excerpt:

Police departments across Indiana and the country are spending thousands of dollars apiece on a truth verification device that some scientists say doesn't work.

The Computer Voice Stress Analyzer, designed by a former Indianapolis Police Department officer, claims to help officers assess truthfulness by measuring changes in one's voice.

Eighty-five Indiana police departments, including IPD, use the machines, which start at $10,700 each.

The designer, Charles Humble, now is chairman and CEO of the National Institute for Truth Verification, which makes the machines. In its literature, the Palm Beach, Fla., company touts it as "a very reliable investigative tool for verifying statements of witnesses, denials of suspects and for determining the validity of allegations made against police officers."

But several scientific experiments have shown the machine, which went on the market in 1988, is no more than 50 percent reliable -- in other words, a coin toss.

In addition, the manufacturer conceded in a product liability lawsuit in California that the machine can't measure whether someone is lying.


In San Diego, murder charges were dropped against two teenagers after it was determined their confessions were coerced after they flunked voice stress tests.

One of the boys sued the National Institute for Truth Verification, claiming the analyzer was used to get the false confession.

In a court filing, the manufacturer said: "NITV acknowledges that the CVSA is not capable of lie detection and specifically cautions its users regarding the proper use of the device."


Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous Ítes intellectuellement faillite.
Back to top
IP Logged
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint