Normal Topic advice.. (Read 1995 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box blind
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 16th, 2006
advice..
Mar 17th, 2006 at 7:22pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I work for a private company that distributes prescription drugs. Recent discrepencies in inventory are leading to a lot of talk about polygraphy getting involved. It seems that the polygraphy protection act does not cover my company because of this exemption;
Quote:

To prospective employees of pharmaceutical and other firms authorized to manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substances who will have direct access to such controlled substances


I am innocent, but so was a good friend of mine who went to prison for 6 years after taking a lie-detector and failing. I am worried about this, and afraid of a false positive test. 

Should I refuse to take the test? Should I employ countermeasures, like I read in the downloadable book? I'm petrified, as this would mean the end of my career! 


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Online


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6220
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: advice..
Reply #1 - Mar 17th, 2006 at 7:51pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Although Section 2006 (f) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act includes an exemption for "drug security, drug theft, or drug diversion investigations," it appears that your employer would nonetheless be bound by the restrictions in Section 2007, which provides in relevant part: "In the case of an exemption described in subsection (e) or (f) of such section, the exemption shall not apply if the results of an analysis of a polygraph test chart are used, or the refusal to take a polygraph test is used, as the sole basis upon which an adverse employment action described in paragraph (1) is taken against an employee or prospective employee."

I think the best option for you (and your colleagues) is to refuse the polygraph. If your company takes any action against you for refusing the polygraph, it opens itself to a potential lawsuit that could cost it dearly. I suggest that you consult with an attorney with expertise in federal labor law. Martindale's Lawyer Locator service may be helpful in finding one near you:

http://www.martindale.com
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box blind
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 16th, 2006
Re: advice..
Reply #2 - Mar 17th, 2006 at 7:55pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
So 2007(a) overrules their exemption status? Thats fantastic! If I receive word of a formal polygraphy test, I will print out this information and take it to the company and an attorney, if necessary!

thankyou very much for your input! I am fw this website to all of my employees!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Online


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6220
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: advice..
Reply #3 - Mar 17th, 2006 at 8:03pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
The restrictions in Section 2007 do not "overrule" the exemption given in Section 2006 to employers who distribute controlled substances, but they govern its application. The bottom line is, you cannot be punished simply for refusing the polygraph.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box blind
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 16th, 2006
Re: advice..
Reply #4 - Mar 17th, 2006 at 8:09pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
understood! thankyou very much for taking the time to explain and clarify this for me.  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Bill Crider
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 213
Joined: Mar 26th, 2004
Re: advice..
Reply #5 - Mar 17th, 2006 at 8:38pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I would get it in writing somehow that there is no evidence to implicate you whatsoever before you refuse the polygraph. Then, if it goes to court, you will be solidly protected according to the statutes that George mentions.

You are only protected if you can win in court.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
advice..

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X