Normal Topic Another polygraph failure? (Read 1608 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Brandon Hall
Ex Member


Another polygraph failure?
Oct 19th, 2005 at 2:14am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Below is a link to information found at thesmokinggun.com in regard to a man who managed to become naturalized as well as infiltrate US interests and receive a high level security clearance with use of fraudulent information including name, origin, date of birth, etc.  Although, nothing can be found in the report which states the man was subjected to a polygraph exam, he was subjected to a DOD background check which likely included a polygraph exam.

link:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1017051malki1.html
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6220
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: Another polygraph failure?
Reply #1 - Oct 19th, 2005 at 8:41am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Brandon,

I seem to recall reading somewhere that the Arabic translators Titan sent to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba had been required to submit to polygraph screening. Perhaps the same is true with regard to those sent to Iraq.

However, the DoD's standard polygraph screening technique, the "Test for Espionage and Sabotage," does not include any relevant questions about the examinee's identity or the accuracy of information provided in the examinee's Standard Form 86 (Questionnaire for National Security Positions).
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Brandon Hall
Ex Member


Re: Another polygraph failure?
Reply #2 - Oct 19th, 2005 at 3:49pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George,

Thank you for the insight.  I am not familiar with the SF86 as I have never seen it.  I figure the governmental reliance on polygraph screening would surely apply to translators trusted with sensitive classified information thusly resulting in a full scope test, however I realize my assumption is conjecture as this is not mentioned in the linked report.  It would seem his background check, possibly including polygraph screening, was a complete failure.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Another polygraph failure?

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X