Normal Topic Warning (Read 4468 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box PG-Govt
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 8th, 2005
Warning
Jul 9th, 2005 at 4:42pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Lorraine,

If you are contemplating the use of countermeasures on Monday, don't.

We will be watching.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Sergeant1107
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 730
Location: Connecticut, USA
Joined: May 21st, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Warning
Reply #1 - Jul 9th, 2005 at 5:39pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
PG-Govt wrote on Jul 9th, 2005 at 4:42pm:
Lorraine,

If you are contemplating the use of countermeasures on Monday, don't.

We will be watching.


What an Orwellian message!  I can only hope it was written tongue-in-cheek...

By the way, if countermeasures don’t work, why would anyone care if they were used?  And if countermeasures such as thinking “exciting” thoughts or altering your breathing pattern can defeat any test, how valid could that test be?
  

Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box tasercop
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 14
Joined: Jul 7th, 2005
Re: Warning
Reply #2 - Jul 9th, 2005 at 6:33pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Because they are detectable and when you get caught, you are blacklisted for life.  True, some examiners can't pick them up, usually the old timers who are doing the same thing they did 30 years ago.  However, they are dying off and being replaced with much better educated examiners trained in countermeasure detection.  If I knew I was going to lie, for whatever reason, I would probably try countermeasures.  What would I have to lose?   But if the intent is to be truthful, there is no need to lie and using countermeasures to "help myself" is stupid and can easily end a promising career. 

And yes Lorraine, when you are sitting in the chair, we are watching!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Drew Richardson
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 427
Joined: Sep 7th, 2001
Re: Warning
Reply #3 - Jul 9th, 2005 at 6:42pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Tasercop,

Glad to see you made it back before I have to leave town for a couple of days.  With regard to ending promising careers, I would wager dollars to donuts that your profession ends (stops before they start) 100 or  more times (I realize there is no way to verify) the number of promising careers with false positive results than do innocent applicants who mis-apply countermeasures.  And sorry to rain on your parade, but just because you made it to 21st century polygraphy doesn't make you any more clairvoyant than the polygraphers of the past century.  Have a pleasant weekend...cheers
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Sergeant1107
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 730
Location: Connecticut, USA
Joined: May 21st, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Warning
Reply #4 - Jul 10th, 2005 at 12:18am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
tasercop wrote on Jul 9th, 2005 at 6:33pm:
But if the intent is to be truthful, there is no need to lie and using countermeasures to "help myself" is stupid and can easily end a promising career.


Despite all the accounts on this message board relating how various people told the truth, did not attempt countermeasures, and still failed, you still have no difficulty advising people to be truthful?

I would have to respectfully ask how you can justify that.  Do you really believe that every person on this board who claims to have told the truth was actually lying?  Or do you believe that every person on this board with unfavorable reviews of polygraph examiners just happened to have a "bad" or "unprofessional" examiner?

I, as well as many others on this board, know I was truthful and still had the examiner look me in the eye and solemnly tell me they knew I was lying.  The examiner then reported to the agency I was applying to that I was lying, so it couldn't have simply been a bluff to get me to confess.

I am truly curious.  What makes you think the same thing won't happen to the next person who takes a polygraph?

  

Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Warning

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X