Normal Topic TEXAS (Read 5688 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box HomeSteader
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2005
TEXAS
May 6th, 2005 at 8:10pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Is it true that Texas can force polygraph's on post convicted persons who are ordered to undergo SOTA treatment?

If so, will/can someone explain that since the US Supreme courts have found them totally unrealiable and without scientific basis how a state force what our highest courts do not allow in court...

Also, if a examiner claims that an exainmee has been deceptive what are the consequenses; even if the examinee does not disclose incriminating statements or denies the results?

GoFigure?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Mr. Truth
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 192
Joined: Aug 4th, 2003
Re: TEXAS
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2005 at 4:44pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
You can only begin to imagine the pleasure of failing one when you were telling the truth. How about 16 hours of community service to "incentive-ize" you to be more truthful?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box HomeSteader
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 6
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2005
Re: TEXAS
Reply #2 - May 9th, 2005 at 5:29pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
What is it with the Texas oppressors?

Do they believe they hold the crystal ball and have all the answers
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #3 - May 9th, 2005 at 11:50pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Sorry but ignorance is not knowledge dorkcorbra.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #4 - May 10th, 2005 at 7:01am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I don't think even the Supreme Court has looked at all of the evidence behind polygraph testing. So in my opinion they are still ignorant.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #5 - May 10th, 2005 at 9:58pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Well how bout you polygraph me in front of the Supreme Court and I will prove to you and them that your machine can be beaten? This will in fact prove how ignorant both of you are.

P.S.
Just because they don't question the validity does not mean they have examined all of the research in regards to "polygraphy". Thus enabling them to still be ignorant.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #6 - May 11th, 2005 at 2:09am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
At least my profession is not based on lies and ruining people's lives. They don't have time to look at all the data, but they can make a ruling on such? Sorry but we don't have time to hear all the facts, YOUR GUILTY. For your sake I hope so, because after all what is a polygrapher qualified to do? Maybe you will be taking my order at the drive through. Try looking in the mirror the next day when the polygraph is exposed,wish I could be there to see the look on your face.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #7 - May 11th, 2005 at 5:03am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Well I have taken an passed numerous polygraphs...so as much as I dislike polygraphers I was able to look them in the face with a BS smile on. The key was doing my homework before I went in, and to know that you and your other polygraph buddies are a fraud. The whole time I was sitting there, I was laughing inside because I knew the game he was playing. Won't be long till everyone knows your game and you will be in the unemployment line. Cheers*
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #8 - May 11th, 2005 at 6:44pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Sorry darkcobra but where in my post did I say I lied? I simply stated that I knew the polygraph was a fraud. Learn to read. Oh I forgot you only need a GED to perform polygraphs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anxietyguy
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 19th, 2004
Gender: Male
Re: TEXAS
Reply #9 - May 12th, 2005 at 8:47pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Your clues are worthless,are you informing me that you are a trained investigator too?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TEXAS

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X