(UTC)
  AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › Polygraph Policy › Naked Science: Criminal Memories
(Moderator: Administrator)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Naked Science: Criminal Memories (Read 2323 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6211
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Naked Science: Criminal Memories
Jan 18th, 2005 at 9:29am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
On 13 January 2005, London's Dana Centre, in its "Naked Science" series, hosted a panel discussion on memory-testing technologies. Polygraphy and voice stress analysis were also discussed. Featured speakers included Paul Matthews, neuroscientist, University of Oxford, Jennifer Vendemia, psychologist, University of South Carolina, and Tor Butler-Cole, medical ethicist, King's College London.

Dr. Vendemia has received some $5 million in taxpayer-funded research grants, including from the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute. As such her remarks will be of particular interest to those following U.S. trends.

A video recording of the discussion is available on-line. See, Naked Science: Criminal Memories.
  
George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
WWWTwitterYouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box AnalSphincter
Ex Member


Re: Naked Science: Criminal Memories
Reply #1 - Feb 10th, 2005 at 9:03pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Outstanding video link, George!  I really enjoyed it.  I particularly enjoyed the comments of Jennifer Vendemia, a psychologist from the University of South Carolina.  Her comments on the "Bogus Pipeline," wherein convincing people of the accuracy of "the box" can help drive its accuracy were interesting.  Perhaps, using reverse psychology, your trying to convince people of the IN-acurracy of "the box" might in some way drive its occasional IN-accuracy.  If so, then playing with people's heads as you do on this forum may be a disservice to both them and polygraphy.  Something to think about.  Anyway, thanks again for the link.   Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Naked Science: Criminal Memories

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge