Ray wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2005 at 6:41am:


ummm...   who is "they"?   

It looks to me that you are not reading this properly and perhaps need to read it again to understand the post.

Ray wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2005 at 6:41am:


My attack was not generalized, as it is pretty hard to make a generalized/personal attack.  It was directed from A to B with a specific criticism of the person's spelling ability.  

Yes, I did attack this person and would do it again and again.  
Why?  Simple, if someone in this law enforcement field considers himself enough of an educated professional to decide the fate of applicants/parolees/criminals through their "intense training and knowledge of human physiology" then I would hope that they were at least smart enough to properly spell DAMN; a word that is used very regularly in America.

From your post it appears that you have read my posts before and if you had bothered to actually understand what you have read you would have realized that I am both for and against the use of polygraphs and have often stated how valuable they are as an investigative/interrogation tool in LE, but a person's life should not be decided solely  on the results of the poly.

Therefore, I am merely attacking this individual for his incompetence and not because he is a polygrapher.  

Ray wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2005 at 6:41am:

My post was not personalized, rather directed toward all polygraphers so don't take it too personal I dislike all of you equally.