http://www.polygraph.org/ is a pro-polygraph site do some reading its full of misinformation
Division IV: Code of Ethics
4.2 Standards for Rendering Polygraph Decisions
4.2.1 A member shall not render a conclusive diagnosis when the physiological records lack sufficient quality and clarity. This may include, but is not limited to, excessively distorted recordings possibly due to manipulations by the examinee, recordings with insufficient responsivity, or recordings with tracing amplitudes less than that generally accepted by the profession
4.4 Restrictions on Rendering Opinions
4.4.1 A member shall not provide any report or opinion regarding the medical or psychological condition of the examinee for which the member is not professionally qualified to make. This shall not preclude the examiner from describing the appearance or behavior of the examinee. Polygraph outcome decisions shall be restricted to only those based on polygraph data.
4.11 APA Oversight Authority
4.11.1 A member who administers or attempts to administer any polygraph examination in violation of the Code of Ethics or the Standards of Practice may be subject to investigation, censure, suspension or expulsion from the Association, as provided by Article IV of the APA Constitution.
Anal have you ever heard of an examiner getting in trouble.
Not one case in Kentucky in the last ten years, its hard to believe huh. These guys are just like attorneys they cover for each other. Anal have you ever heard of an examiner getting in trouble.
Not one case in Kentucky in the last ten years, its hard to believe huh. These guys are just like attorneys they cover for each other.
Oh I have access to the news letters of the KPA and the APA.