hi!

i am new to the sex offender program and i am xxx old. i understand i need to take a polygraph.

can anyone tell me where to go or where not to go when it is time? i am confused and VERY scared!

You're lying to him; even if one tells the truth, s/he may not pass, that's the whole point of this board.  You must be new here, so I thought I'd mention that.

So, there are counter-counter measures, eh?  What, is that like double secret probation or something?

And, what constituted the development of counter-countermeasures, the fact that that poly's are so flawed? 

With such inperfection in the polys, once the counter-countermeasures are mastered, are you going to throw another prefix of counter infront of the CCM and make it CCCM? Such crap. 

Don't give advise here; you're a novice.

hey guys,

been in the business a long time. i am an examiner. you can give them false advice, but you can't fool me.

There is no "Crap" here. If you  try countermeasures, it will be detected. Even IF there are those who can utilize countermeasures to defeat the polygraph..they are VERY FEW and i have never met them.

Sluggo, please be a little more professional. you sound like a child when you attack. Further, you have 11 replies to this message board and two failed polygraphs. Is that what it takes to exclude someone from being a "novice"? 

Thank you George for a respectful response. The reason no one will respond to the "Challenge" is because it does not merit a response from serious polygraph examiners.

Good Luck NOPOLY!

POLYSCORE wrote on Aug 12^th, 2004 at 5:15pm:


Why not? Especially considering that the polygraph community has not offered any evidence whatsoever that it has any ability to detect countermeasures?

George,

The only thing I can GUARENTEE is that if someone is deceptive about the issues at hand and/or utilize any form of countermeasure, they are MUCH LESS likely to pass a polygraph. Those chances are far greater than the opportunity for a "false positive".

George, i catch guys on a weekly basis that try these countermeasures. We are in tune with them. The type of person that would attempt a countermeasure on a chart simply DOES NOT have the ability to "fool" a "qualified" examiner. they don't have the experience. we know what a true reaction is. we know what countermeasures look like. how can one coverup a true reaction with a countermeasure?  I promise you that you cannot! one might beat that particular examiner, but one will not beat a savvy examiner. Again, we are in tune with what is going on.

If you are simply just afraid of a false positive and express that, it will be noted, but PLEASE FOLKS, do not put your faith in "helping" an examiner with grading your charts... it doesnt look good. But if you are guilty of that crime and want to cover that up, i GUARENTEE i will catch you! There is now new information, new players and new equipment that is not available to the vast majority...

thanks folks,

Note that both "nopoly," who started this message thread posing as a convicted sex offender, and "POLYSCORE," who claimed to be able to detect countermeasures, posted all of their posts from the same IP address.

Here we have yet another sad example of a frightened polygrapher attempting to spread disinformation.

The only down side to this forum is that it gives comfort to lying sex-offender cons.

anti-anti wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2006 at 7:42pm:


anti-anti,

Considering that polygraph "tests" have no scientific basis, and that liars can easily pass through the use of simple countermeasures that polygraphers cannot reliably detect, is it not sheer idiocy for government to rely on polygraphy to monitor probationers and parolees?