Quote:
If you "stumbled across" some dog shit in your "quest" for a sandwich, would you eat it instead? That's the same thing as using the shit on this site instead of real knowledge.
Any person of some intelligence would identify the "shit" as "shit" and simply step over it. What I stumbled on here ,in my curiousity about what I was about to be experiencing, was a well though out opinion. A seemingly intelligent opinion, unlike your vulgar post which has done nothing to convince me this site is incorrect.
I found myself wondering why are these things not allowed in court? Why is the government the only entity that can use this thing in employee screening? Why is it something so powerful and accurate it can tell that I am lying is held to these restrictions? Surely such a tool would be invaluable in the court system if it is foolproof! Imagine how much time it would save in these lengthy trials! Surely this great technology can be helpful in our court system that is so behind the times, hey, it's 2004! Why not?
So then I see this site and it is clear to me now. Anyone with a sense of logic can see it all too clearly here. It is obvious to me why those who polygraph would be angered by this website. Imagine finding out that all those people who got through you could have played you all along. Imagine the information on this site is what allowed that to happen. I would be angry too.
I am not an idiot, I realize the information on this site can help subpar people get jobs they should not have, or assist in getting criminals off the hook. But also I see where this whole control question thing can hurt an honest person.
It is obvious to me it is not the intent of the writers to help bad people through, but to get rid of the polygraph altogether and rely on better background checks instead.
Good job with the site and thank you. I would have been one of those to answer honestly and maybe pay the price for it.