Normal Topic What do you think??? (Read 5042 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Anonymous
Guest


What do you think???
Dec 11th, 2003 at 12:55am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I took my poly earlier this week with a local PD and I am not sure how I did.

The exam started with 5 "calibration" questions followed by 3 rounds of 16 questions asked in random order. As near as I could tell, there was only one discernible control question.

By the end of it, the examiner asked what I thought I reacted to. Naturally, I said the control which I manipulated and he agreed showed a reaction. But he said there was also a reaction to a drug-related question which I know I absolutely did not lie on. I said the only thing I could think that would cause a reaction was an argument about drug issues I had earlier in the week (that was the most innocuous thing I could think of without risking further interrogation). The examiner asked me to write that down and sign it. He said he would forward the signed document to my BI and it was up to him on how to proceed and that a retest may be necessary. 

Should I take the initiative and call my BI directly and tell him the results of my poly, or wait for him to call me with a decision? Any thought on how this will turn out for me? I am at my wit's end with these polygraph's. If I am being accused of lying for this, I know the machines are not doing what they should be doing. 

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box bushido71
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Sep 24th, 2003
Re: What do you think???
Reply #1 - Dec 12th, 2003 at 5:33am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I'm no expert, but it could go either way from what you've said. It does not look good that there was any kind of "post-test" discussion. Typically, at least according to TLBTLD, that is a sign that you did not pass. But it seems to be counterbalanced by the fact that your examiner suggested that a retest may be required. That would seem to indicate an "inconclusive" result which is certainly better than failing. It also helps that you had a reasonable excuse for showing the reaction that you did. It probably boils down to how you sold the story to the examiner and whether or not he believed you.

George or some of the other more experienced users may have a more educated viewpoint on your results. Either way, best of luck to you.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Anonymous
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #2 - Dec 12th, 2003 at 10:26pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Thanks for the reply. I don't know if I would necessarily qualify the end of the test as any kind of interrogation. The examiner never left the room to "check the charts" or speak to his "supervisor." There was no good cop-bad cop. He showed me the charts throughout the exam. Somewhere in the middle, he asked what questions I was thinking about. I said the control question. He said good, but that there were also a couple of other questions I showed reactions to. After the last round, he asked me about the one drug-related question and I gave him my reasoning for having a reaction. The examiner was pleasant throughout the entire process and asked how I thought I did. I told him I knew I did well and was extremely confident. 

I don't know how the computerized systems work, but he did seem to rely pretty heavily on its findings. He never indicated that he thought I was lying about the question, only that I was thinking of something when he asked it. He wanted to know what I was thinking of and why it would elicit any reaction. I explained it the best as I could.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box BlueFlu
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #3 - Dec 12th, 2003 at 10:34pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
You said you manipulated the control question. What was the control question and how did you manipulate it? Did you use the anal contraction? If so, how much pressure did you apply? I ask because I know TLBTLD says you should only use a little, but I tend to think you need to use slightly more than that in order to get successful results. I don't mean all out effort, because that would be too obvious, but more than half-effort. Also, I don't know how the computers intepret these kinds of reactions. I know a lot of places use the Polyscore software which has been debunked by a lot of polygraph peer groups as being very inaccurate.  I don't know if the program even compares the relevant reactions to the control reactions. If not, then it wouldn't matter what kind of reaction you showed on the control.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box astounded
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #4 - Dec 12th, 2003 at 11:26pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
some much advice - so little knowlege
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box BlueFlu
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #5 - Dec 13th, 2003 at 12:57am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I assume you meant "so much advice..."

What exactly are you trying to get at, Astounding?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Online


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6230
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: What do you think???
Reply #6 - Dec 13th, 2003 at 10:07am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Anonymous,

I think bushido71's observations were quite cogent. While there is no strong indication that you may have "failed," it is possible that your polygrapher may have deemed the charts to be "inconclusive" (or close to being so).

Your replies when asked what question(s) you thought you reacted to and how you thought you did on the polygraph were also quite astute.

  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Anonymous
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #7 - Dec 14th, 2003 at 12:53am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Thank you for the feedback. I am breathing a little more easily given your opinions. I will post the final results here, but if I do indeed pass, I will owe it to the invaluable information found on this site.

The fact that I show reactions to questions I did not lie on proves to me that this is a junk science that needs to be abolished, or at the very least, have its importance in the pre-employment process tapered back.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box LASD Hopeful
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #8 - Dec 15th, 2003 at 6:37am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Anonymous, 

I am in a similar situation as you. I recently took a polygraph with the LA County Sheriff. I was told I had a reaction to one question (drug-related) which I explained was a result of my thinking about some former friends I no longer associate with because of their drug use. The examiner asked me to write it down and sign it. That must be standard operating procedure for them. Anyway, he appeared satisfied with my explanation but did not say if I passed or failed. He said "you may have to come back and retest so we can focus on the issues that seemed to bother you" but that it was ultimately a BI decision. 

Although the door seems to be open for an "inconclusive" or an "NDI" I am still worried that I will get that dreaded DQ letter. 

Has anyone here ever passed a poly under similar circumstances???
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fred F.
Very Senior User
****
Offline


Get Educated.... Knowledge
is Power

Posts: 225
Joined: Apr 4th, 2001
Re: What do you think???
Reply #9 - Dec 16th, 2003 at 6:12am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
Anonymous, 

I am in a similar situation as you. I recently took a polygraph with the LA County Sheriff. I was told I had a reaction to one question (drug-related) which I explained was a result of my thinking about some former friends I no longer associate with because of their drug use. The examiner asked me to write it down and sign it. That must be standard operating procedure for them. Anyway, he appeared satisfied with my explanation but did not say if I passed or failed. He said "you may have to come back and retest so we can focus on the issues that seemed to bother you" but that it was ultimately a BI decision. 

Although the door seems to be open for an "inconclusive" or an "NDI" I am still worried that I will get that dreaded DQ letter. 

Has anyone here ever passed a poly under similar circumstances???


LASD Hopeful,

You should have NOT given the polygrapher a written statement. That  more than likely will be used against you. The polygrapher will not tell you if you "pass or fail" unless he really wants to get a response from you. 

You need to check with your BI ASAP to find out if they have viewed the results. They will make the decision on whether you continue or DQ.

Also FYI, The LASD has just cancelled the next academy for Jan. and denied promotions to sworn staff because of the ongoing budget crisis in LA County. You may want to check  other options in the LA area such as LAX Airport Police and  the LA Port Police.

Good Luck, 

Fred F. Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box LASD Hopeful
Guest


Re: What do you think???
Reply #10 - Dec 16th, 2003 at 6:41am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Fred,

Thanks for the information. I am not sure what else I could have done when the examiner asked for the signed statement. Refusing to do so would seem to only raise suspicions. Plus, I felt my reason for having showed a reaction to the drug question was valid and yet did not open the door for additional interrogation. 

Nevertheless, I did immediately call my BI who said they would talk to the examiner, but I have not heard anything since (it's been about a week). I am going crazy with worry and anticipation!!!!

I volunteer for the LASD and also heard about the denial of promotions but did not know the January class was cancelled. That is certainly unfortunate. I believe I would have been in line for the June class anyway. I hope I will still be able to continue in the process in the meantime. I am also in the process with LAPD and a couple of smaller local agencies.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
What do you think???

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X