Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) I did what1? (Read 28187 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Marty
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 499
Joined: Sep 27th, 2002
Re: I did what1?
Reply #15 - Nov 18th, 2003 at 12:18am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
As I said, Ted Seals is an alias and the actual events have been changed to protect the "innocent".  Was it LAPD or San Fransisco PD? Maybe Jackson County Sheriff or Miami-Dade?  Maybe I am not really from East LA but from Waco, Taxas.  No one knows who I am and no one will know that I beat the polygraph because I only "boasted" here and no polygrapher is going to be able to tell what control or relevent questions are "his".    Sorry to let you guys down. Cry


Chuckle.  Diffuse and confuse. A little late now, but , hey, don't go "tripp'n"

"Waco, Taxas", lol.

-Marty
  

Leaf my Philodenrons alone.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Roger
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #16 - Nov 18th, 2003 at 3:46am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Ted Seals, although I don't approve of some of the choices you have made in your past, I am happy that you took the time to post here about your experience.  You are helping to show proof that the polygraph is severely flawed.  It is routinely beaten both with and without countermeasures.  I have been a police officer for over 18 years, and during my time as a cop I have heard many stories about the polygraph's use and misuse.  The state I work in has the good sense to not use lie detector tests.  My point is that whether I agree with an individual or not, I would like to see more people like yourself step up and share their experiences of beating the polygraph, because I know it happens more than most would suspect.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Kona
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 159
Joined: Sep 23rd, 2003
Re: I did what1?
Reply #17 - Nov 18th, 2003 at 7:28am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
What old Ted lacks in spelling skills and personal integrity, he certainly makes up for with street smarts and confidence.  Is this the type of person that I want patrolling our streets, or backing me up on a drug bust?  Well, let's just say that there are numerous other people out there that I would rather have on the force.  If he had done these things as a young kid 10 or more years ago, and had truely turned over a new leaf, I might cut him some slack.  One thing he has clearly demonstrated, is just how bogus the polygraph is, and how many police departments out there place way too much confidence in this witchcraft.  A solid investigation, utilizing human intel, with face to face interviews, probably would have turned up some unsavory tidbits on our friend Ted, and he wouldn't be academy bound right now.   

As for finding out his true identity......yeah, right.   

Kona

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Ray
Senior User
***
Offline



Posts: 78
Joined: Jan 10th, 2003
Re: I did what1?
Reply #18 - Nov 20th, 2003 at 11:52pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Ted, you posted the following: "I took my polygraph with LAPD last month and passed it"...."I took the interview and scored a 96"..."I lied about my drug history by saying I tried marijuana twice and never touched anything else."  You then listed the exact questions on the test and your exact responses to the post-test questions.

You better hope there were plenty of applicants who took the poly last month, reported using marijuana only twice on their application forms, AND scored a 96 on the interview portion of testing.

In addition, examiners do keep a record of the exact questions they ask on each test; and keep in mind, these questions are generally changed from test to test.

Nice try to cover your tracks though.  It may not be tomorrow or next week but this will catch up to you.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box sosdd
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #19 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 12:58am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I wouldn't worry about Teddy bear.  I doubt he even exists.  Most of these "success" stories are simply figments of George and his elves' imagination.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Skeptic
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 549
Joined: Jun 24th, 2002
Re: I did what1?
Reply #20 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 3:24am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
I wouldn't worry about Teddy bear.  I doubt he even exists.  Most of these "success" stories are simply figments of George and his elves' imagination.


Right.  It's all a big conspiracy, and by the way, they ARE talking about you.

Skeptic
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box guest
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #21 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 6:46am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
sosdd, if you truly don't believe any of these "success stories", you are an absolutely ignorant individual.  Any person with a shred of itellect and common sense would easily understand that the polygraph is so very unworthy of detecting lies.  Without instilling fear in an examinee's mind, which could lead to a confession, there is no way the polygraph could possiby be responsible for detecting deception. I find it ironic how the CVSA people and the polygraph people denounce one another, when in fact they are both a load of crap.  In fact these devices are no more than props used by interrogators.  However, if I spent a few weeks learning my "trade", I would defend it as well.  How many other careers that require so little to be certified are taken seriously.      
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6232
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: I did what1?
Reply #22 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 8:58am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Ray wrote on Nov 20th, 2003 at 11:52pm:
Ted, you posted the following: "I took my polygraph with LAPD last month and passed it"...."I took the interview and scored a 96"..."I lied about my drug history by saying I tried marijuana twice and never touched anything else."  You then listed the exact questions on the test and your exact responses to the post-test questions.

You better hope there were plenty of applicants who took the poly last month, reported using marijuana only twice on their application forms, AND scored a 96 on the interview portion of testing.

In addition, examiners do keep a record of the exact questions they ask on each test; and keep in mind, these questions are generally changed from test to test.

Nice try to cover your tracks though.  It may not be tomorrow or next week but this will catch up to you.  


Ray,

Assuming that the details that "Ted Seals" posted in his first message are accurate, then I agree with you that they may well provide an adequate basis for his identification. However, I think doing so would be against the interests of the LAPD polygraph unit because it would necessarily entail informing others in the LAPD (and the Public Safety Hiring Division) that they had miserably failed to detect both deception and countermeasures. In addition, it would lead to personal embarrassment for whoever turned out to be the polygrapher who passed "Ted Seals" (as well as the presumably more senior polygraphers who conducted "quality control").
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6232
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: I did what1?
Reply #23 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 12:34pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
I wouldn't worry about Teddy bear.  I doubt he even exists.  Most of these "success" stories are simply figments of George and his elves' imagination.


And just how do you know this to be true? Perhaps a fairy whispered in your ear?

While it is possible that "Ted Seals" is a prankster (perhaps intent on sending the LAPD polygraph unit chasing their tails), I see no a priori reason to assume that such is the case. For me, his mention (and correct identification) of "hypothetical control" questions not included in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (see p. 104 of the 3rd ed.) lends credence to his post.

With The Lie Behind the Lie Detector averaging over 100 downloads a day, the countermeasure success stories posted on this message board are likely just the tip of the iceberg.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box A Mom
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #24 - Nov 25th, 2003 at 2:08am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
This Ted person makes me sad, Embarrassed mad  Cryand disgusted.  Sadly my sons chances of becoming a police officer were ruined by the by the LAPD and its polygraph testing, he is not alone as so many other (honest applicants) including my son did not use countermeasures and told the whole truth, yet were DQ'ed due to a test that should never be used for anything. 

The fact that this Ted person is here bragging about his past filled with unlawful practices and actions not becoming anyone seeking a position in law enforcement,and the fact he still passed the test is of little surprise to me as the test itself is so flawed that the lier passed and the honest young applicants fail.

I wonder when this City will come to it's sences and stop using this test as a determiner for the suitability of those persons going through the process.  The B.I.s should use their investagations to investigate !!! (hopefully finding those applicants who un-fairly include names of people who will out and out lie for them) and DQ  those liars not applicants who are so fearful of the polygraph that they take too many breaths or sweat or seem scared during the process of taking the test itself.  For Gods sake this City is financially in a real bad situation and these tests are expensive and unrealiable.  Why continue to pay for them?????????  Let's go back to the old way and have the Cops do their job and pick those applicants who are suitable and come reccommended by their familys, neighbors, bosses, co-workers, teachers, preists and friends.

I pary that this Ted person gets no further than the front door of the Academy and is found out!  Or, like so many others before him, he will cost this City and its citizens money in the future by acting out his past and being the creep that he had admitted to being by his posts here.  God is watching "TED" don't be so darn proud of being a liar, drug user, and a all around smart ass of a person.  If  ??? you make it through the entire process you might become the next Rafel Perez!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and land your own butt in jail.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Ted Seals
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #25 - Dec 3rd, 2003 at 5:42am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I am now certified and scheduled for the upcoming academy.  I guess the polygraphers could not figure out who I am.  I must admit, the hiring process with LAPD is tough.  No wonder so many people get disqualified.  I know I will do very well in the academy.  I will not be told to grab my "Hat n' ; Books".  Peace out, All!!! Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Ted Seals
Guest


Re: I did what1?
Reply #26 - Dec 3rd, 2003 at 5:56am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Oh yeah, and Mom, wake up, there is no God.  There is no heaven or hell; no souls; no afterlife; nothing.  The only ones watching me are those looking at me.  Nighty night, Mom! Kiss
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Skeptic
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 549
Joined: Jun 24th, 2002
Re: I did what1?
Reply #27 - Dec 3rd, 2003 at 7:13am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
I am now certified and scheduled for the upcoming academy.  I guess the polygraphers could not figure out who I am.  I must admit, the hiring process with LAPD is tough.  No wonder so many people get disqualified.  I know I will do very well in the academy.  I will not be told to grab my "Hat n' ; Books".  Peace out, All!!! Grin


Regardless of whether "Seals" is qualified for the position or not, I have to say that his case (assuming he's being truthful regarding his admission to the academy, of course) is an excellent illustration of polygrapher truthfulness, and their equally bold assertions regarding countermeasures should be considered in that context.

Of course, if we wanted evidence that their claims are nothing more than baseless boasts, the fact that none have had the courage to take the Polygraph Countermeasure Challenge, still standing after nearly two years (!), already speaks volumes...

Skeptic
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box formula1
Ex Member


Re: I did what1?
Reply #28 - Dec 3rd, 2003 at 8:09pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
I am now certified and scheduled for the upcoming academy.  I guess the polygraphers could not figure out who I am.  I must admit, the hiring process with LAPD is tough.  No wonder so many people get disqualified.  I know I will do very well in the academy.  I will not be told to grab my "Hat n' ; Books".  Peace out, All!!! Grin



I do believe your story is a fabrication.  I believed you up until this point.  Tell me, what is your academy date??

What upcoming academy?? I am also done with the entire process and am waiting for my academy date.

Seeing as how there will be no more academies starting for 2003, and academy dates have not been set for 2004, I find it hard to believe you are scheduled for an academy that hasn't been scheduled!  

It can't possibly be class 01/04, because that is a lateral class; unless you are a lateral?  
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Jack_T
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Joined: Oct 13th, 2003
Re: I did what1?
Reply #29 - Dec 3rd, 2003 at 11:02pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I don't think that Ted is telling the entire truth (as we know he is a liar). If he was being sceduled for a psych on November 14th, there is no way he could have finished the rest of the entire process in 2 weeks. I think you should go back to smoking crack Ted. You are a really bad liar, and I don't think your dumb drugged out ass is smart enough to get you through the hiring process for LAPD. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it! ; Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
I did what1?

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X