Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Another case for Comprehensive Protection (Read 2848 times)
NVictim
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 13
Joined: Apr 28th, 2003
Another case for Comprehensive Protection
Aug 13th, 2003 at 9:48pm
Print Post  
Its a shame that these folks have to worry about their jobs because they refuse to take the polygraph.  I guess substaintial proof is no longer needed to accuse and fire someone.

http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/news/6470584.htm

Some quotes I found interesting:

Quote:
But both Bittick and Snyder testified that they showed up to take the polygraph at the Georgia Bureau of Investigation office in Perry but did not take the test because the GBI agent conducting the test didn't behave in a professional and appropriate manner.


Quote:
Johnson described the terminations of Bittick and Snyder as a "witch hunt" and the appeals hearings as "an opportunity to gripe" for Centerville employees.








  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
orolan
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 363
Joined: Dec 25th, 2002
Re: Another case for Comprehensive Protection
Reply #1 - Aug 14th, 2003 at 3:55am
Print Post  
NVictim,
The day before, Centerville Chief of Police Mike Sullivan was quoted thus:
"Sullivan said he thinks polygraph tests are worthless."
  

"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." &&U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo