Normal Topic Intel clearance (Read 11081 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Ya Hoo
Guest


Intel clearance
Aug 13th, 2003 at 6:16am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Anyone out there who's gone through the clearance process with some intelligence agencies?

Is it true that it takes 9 to 11 months - from the date one takes the polygraph exam - to adjudicate a security clearance?

Thanks for your input.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Skeptic
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 549
Joined: Jun 24th, 2002
Re: Intel clearance
Reply #1 - Aug 13th, 2003 at 7:55am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
Anyone out there who's gone through the clearance process with some intelligence agencies?

Is it true that it takes 9 to 11 months - from the date one takes the polygraph exam - to adjudicate a security clearance?

Thanks for your input.


It depends upon the agency.  As I understand it, NSA is currently processing clearances within 4-5 months.  OTOH, I've heard FBI is taking nearly two years.

Skeptic
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box gray
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #2 - Oct 7th, 2003 at 3:16am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
If you apply and are asked to come
in for processing; whatever you do,
DO NOT LIE about anything.

The polygraph is not %100 by itself,
but the interviewer is also an expert
in reading body lanquage, voice tone,etc.

Also, if you are going to work for an Agency
like the CIA, they DEMAND absolute honesty.

If you lie during the interview process, they
will NEVER feel that they can trust you
if you were hired; therefore,
you will NOT be hired; Period.

It is better to admit that you had sex with you
family cat at 15years old, once, then lie about
it; really.
If you smoked marijuana, in the past, and
admit it, and state that you currently are
not using it, they can still hire you;
if you lie about it; forget it.

If, on the other hand, you have used hard
drugs, like cocaine, heroin, LSD, etc
you probably will not be hired.

So, TELL THE TRUTH during the entire interview process;
they understand that people are human and
not angeles;
and if you are currently on the straight and narrow,
assuming you have qualities they are looking for,
you can still be hired if you have a few skeletons
in your closet.

BTW, the polygraph is not perfect, far from
it, but it does point the interviewer in a direction,
and they do use intimidation to some degree;
the key thing is; if you tell the truth, then there
is no where for him to go.

Good Luck.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6217
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: Intel clearance
Reply #3 - Oct 7th, 2003 at 9:28am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Gray,

You write, among other things, "The polygraph is not %100 by itself, but the interviewer is also an expert in reading body lanquage, voice tone,etc."

The CIA's polygraphers have no special ability to detect deception: like other polygraphers, they are quacks pretending to abilities they do not possess.

You also write, "...if you are going to work for an Agency like the CIA, they DEMAND absolute honesty."

Actually, the CIA assumes that even applicants it would like to hire will be less than absolutely honest when answering the so-called "control" questions during a polygraph examination. And the CIA doesn't feel the need to treat applicants with the same candor it expects from them: through the pseudoscientific fraud we know as CQT polygraphy, the Agency lies to and attempts to deceive every single applicant.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box APGodSpy
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #4 - Feb 4th, 2004 at 12:34pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George, I am sorry to hear your ill feelings towards nothing but a system that does nothing but protect you.  How would you do the polygraph process if they have been doing it wrong?   

They do not hint at ever having any special gifts and abilities as to spot liars.  It's simply based on reading the mannerisms, body language, nervous ticks, where the eyes go, and stress in the voice.  By asking someone a series of truth questions and closely watching their mannerisms and where there eyes go you can attain which directions they will look when telling the truth.  Then you proceed to ask questions about what you are looking for.  This time, watch the eyes if they look in the same location.  What does it mean when they look to the lower left, middle left, or upper left.  Same with the right.  It all means something.  Go do some research on it and get back to me on it.  The same with nervouse ticks.  I happen to rub my nose, some pull their ears, and possibly others figet or twitch eyes.   

After the Poly they will try to trip you up with questions in front of a panel and review board.  And the reason they have to lie and cover things up is for national security.  What would you do if you had sensitive information?  You certainly wouldn't plaster it onto website like this one.  And when do they lie to applicants?  i was never lied too, in fact I was told about some of the embarrassing history it had and the community as a whole.  And everyone in intelligence makes mistakes and it is how you learn as in every job.   

It's a shame that there really are hard working officers, analysts and adm personnel working hard to protect you, me and themselves and do it in a manner that is fitting of law.  Then to have people like you who do nothng but give negative comments about everything they do, which is nothing you know about and the activities they conduct.  Does you employer lie to you, DO you have special abilities at the job you work?  What makes you so special and what gives you the right to think you are so smart?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box APGodSpy
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #5 - Feb 4th, 2004 at 12:39pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Also absolute honesty has to be trusted and is expected.  Their jobs come with special responsibilities and you have to find honest people who have to be dishonest in their jobs.  you have to lie about your empolyment unless it is admin or a position that does not put you at risk for coercion, blackmail or being a target.   

Wouldn't you want to know if someone is honest if they were entrusted with unusual technologies, accounts, worldwide contacts, and working position that are sensitive in nature.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Delta Golf
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #6 - Mar 7th, 2004 at 2:59am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
APGodSpy, I think you missed the point George was making.  He wasn't blasting the intelligence community as a whole, but merely pointing out that the hiring process relies upon junk science and calls the data that is entirely subjective "impirical."

That's unacceptable.  Several members of my family have been in multiple agencies that require poly's, and I have plans to be as well when my current obligation is satisfied.  I have never done any drugs or illegal substances in my life, nor comitted any crimes against anyone else, personal, corporate or civil, yet I will be using CM's instead of relying on brutal honesty because I will be screened subjectively by some quack who will be manipulating and lying to try and force me into making false admissions - that is what he is paid for.

That too is unacceptable.  I want nothing more than to be part of, and I quote:
a system that does nothing but protect you.

The fact that I have to manipulate their little hoops they make us jump through to guarantee my position to help this nation is beyond lame.  A proper and standardized background investigation reveals far more appropriate and accurate information than a polygraph ever will, and the false positives that have eliminated patriots with all the skills necesary to serve our national defense community is also unacceptable.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box anti-poly
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #7 - May 26th, 2004 at 2:24am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
What gets me are all the guys that enable and justify the work of these pseudo-scientist polygraphers by claiming "national security" demands absolute honesty. To all you CIA chart-gazers that troll this website: Where are all those Iraqi WMDs your boys told Dubya that Saddam had stockpiled?? Where was all your so-called "absolute honesty" then? Tell us about COINTELPRO, the family jewels, LSD experimentation on unknowing subjects, the Bay of Pigs, and all of those honest crappity smack-ups you saviours of America the beautiful are so honestly responsible for? And day after day you keep dumping the dishonest dope-smoking chaff in the name of national security. RIGHT! I don't know about the rest of America, but I sure do sleep better at night knowing you spooks are performing your heroic deeds! [/sarcasm off]
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Nobody
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #8 - Jul 8th, 2004 at 11:49pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
COINTELPRO was an FBI program.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box FollowMeHome
Guest


Re: Intel clearance
Reply #9 - Jul 11th, 2004 at 3:11am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
As someome who is an ex-NSA employee, and waiting
on adjudication, for reinstatement, it is taking up to a
year to get through the process.  Time between each
poly is taking about three months, and once you get
through the poly, it is taking DoD/DSS up to a year, to
process the TS clearance.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box pixie1276
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 17th, 2004
Re: Intel clearance
Reply #10 - Aug 17th, 2004 at 10:48pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I started the background process with the fbi in mid-july and am already through the background investigation and personnel security interview.  The poly and urinalysis is coming soon, and I will likely begin in either Sept. or Oct....so, the process is not always a long, tedious one.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fair Chance
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Joined: Oct 10th, 2002
Re: Intel clearance
Reply #11 - Aug 18th, 2004 at 2:48pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Dear Pixie1276,

Do not mistake your "security interview" and the preliminary NCICs (computer checks for criminal records in states and cities where you have worked and lived) with the full fledge background checks.

The only way that they finished your background checks in one month would be if you had very little history to research and no foreign military service (recent college graduate with few jobs or residential moves).  The FBI has tried to significantly improve its hiring practices and if you are right, it would be great to see someone moved through the system like you are.  

I would like to know in the future how your application is going (without providing details of course) to see if the system has changed for the better.

I do know that of three conditional letters sent, only one normally survives the polygraph, physical, and final background adjudication and is given a final job offer.  Do not tell anyone about conditional letters because they are "very conditional."

Regards
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Intel clearance

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X