AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - Voice Analysis Technology

(UTC)

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.

In addition, check out our live chat server.

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › CVSA and other Voice Stress Analysis Applications › Voice Analysis Technology

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 [2]

Add Poll

Send Topic

Voice Analysis Technology (Read 13961 times)

suethem Very Senior User Offline Posts: 196 Joined: Apr 29^th, 2003	Re: Voice Analysis Technology Reply #15 - Jul 8^th, 2003 at 12:19am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Guest from Canada, There are polygraph people that support CVSA and there are polygraph people who do not support CVSA. Some polygraph companies actually battle each other, saying that the others products, software and hardware are sub- standard. If you look at the National Institute of Truth Verification Website you can read some CVSA testimonials. Whats interesting is that in most of the cases that were 'solved' by the machine, the suspect confessed. Just like with the polygraph, there are many people who confess to crimes because they believe that the CVSA test is valid. But what happens to those who have nothing to confess, but are labled as liars? They are just the price of American justice. In the Stephanie Crow murder case (Escondido CA), the victim's brother was subjected to a CVSA and confessed after hours of games by a police 'expert'. The police hammered him and ignored reports of a prowler in the area. In the end the prowler was caught and found to have the blood of the dead girl on his shirt. The victim's brother is out of jail and the drifter/prowler is now being charged. This is a prime example of how blind faith in any 'polygraph' is dangerous. The police only followed up on the drifter after they were shamed into action by the community and bad press. In regards to scientific support- the polygraph has none. The National Academy of Sciences shot down the polygraph as invalid and went as far as to say that it is a threat to national security. LE/Intell still use is because there are still people that confess. They are addicted to the confessions and ignore the evidence that honest people are wrongly accused and the guilty people can pass using countermeasures. The polygraph/CVSA is just a business, like any other. Once enough people realize that the product is defective and dangerous it will be recalled.


	IP Logged

guest from canada Guest	Re: Voice Analysis Technology Reply #16 - Jul 8^th, 2003 at 1:25am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Like you said Suethem, it is nothing more than a business. Dollars and cents. I would be willing to bet the farm that the only polygraph people supporting CVSA are from companies with monies and interests already divuldged into the CVSA technology. Polygraph people against the CVSA of course would have no eggs in the CVSA basket and are just trying to save their livelyhood. It would seem to me that the CVSA technology is much cheaper to aquire than the polygraph technology as you don't have to purchase a BP cuff, chest tubes or sweat sensors. I see a real fight in the distance. The only problem with your line of thinking is when you look at the uphill battle we as antipoly crusaders have had trying to educate the public into seeing the lie behind the poly. The poly has been around since the 30's and it doesn't appear to be going anywhere within the LE community for the very reasons you posted. However, if we take the same timeline and apply it to the voice witch doctory that has surfaced, our grandchildren might see the fruits of our labor!


	IP Logged

orolan Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 363 Joined: Dec 25^th, 2002	Re: Voice Analysis Technology Reply #17 - Jul 8^th, 2003 at 1:43am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: Once enough people realize that the product is defective and dangerous it will be recalled. And when it is it will be replaced by this, from our friends to the North. Quote: The ultimate goal upon which the justice system rests -- the search for truth -- has seen any number of sciences and pseudo-sciences come into existence. Some gradually fade away into disrepute, like hair analysis. Others -- DNA is probably the best example -- revolutionize everything from murder investigations to paternity suits. Micro-expression analysis may be part of the next wave. Pioneered by University of California professor Paul Ekman about 30 years ago, the mapping and study of facial movements was until recently treated more as a theory than a science with tangible applications. And the purveyor of this new "science" ??? Quote: A television director by trade, Mr. Gough saw micro-expression analysis as a process that would allow him to marry his technical know-how with an abiding interest in law enforcement. And then we have the next-to-the-last paragraph of the article Quote: Only one truth-finding technique is specifically prohibited during job interviews in many jurisdictions, of which Ontario is one: polygraph testing. The whole article is quite interesting. Read it here: http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20030707/PFMAKI07/TP...

	"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." &&U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
	WWW IP Logged

suethem Very Senior User Offline Posts: 196 Joined: Apr 29^th, 2003	Re: Voice Analysis Technology Reply #18 - Jul 8^th, 2003 at 5:58am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	polygraph/ CVSA / Facial recognition... its all the same. Same con men, different products.


	IP Logged

Pages: 1 [2]

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Voice Analysis Technology

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.