Hot Topic (More than 15 Replies) Almost lost to the "Dark Side" (Read 8507 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box guest from canada
Guest


Re: Almost lost to the "Dark Side"
Reply #15 - Jun 19th, 2003 at 11:42pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I didn't mean for it to come across as such.  I meant to say something along the lines that officers who try rocking the boat or who are seen as potential non conformists may not be received into the blue brotherhood as readily.  Trying to discredit a method that the force has been using might shake up the chiefs (and/or other officers) faith and trust in the informing officer.  They might not feel as close to him/her and start to consciously and/or subconsciously ostrasize that "trouble maker".  Look at how the police and pro polygraph community look towrds that ex cop/polygrapher turn cruisader (sorry can't remeber his name).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Saidme
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 311
Joined: Jun 11th, 2003
Re: Almost lost to the "Dark Side"
Reply #16 - Jun 20th, 2003 at 3:12am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Oh PK, you're my hero.  Come back in about 15 years after you've requested polygraph examinations for suspects in some of your cases (if you ever get in a detective unit).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box suethem
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 196
Joined: Apr 29th, 2003
Re: Almost lost to the "Dark Side"
Reply #17 - Jun 20th, 2003 at 5:04am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
PK,

If you need a polygrapher to help you with your cases, your cases are already in  big trouble!

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Poly-Killer
Senior User
***
Offline


"Knock, Knock!"

Posts: 78
Location: Everywhere
Joined: Apr 29th, 2003
Gender: Male
Re: Almost lost to the "Dark Side"
Reply #18 - Jun 20th, 2003 at 11:22am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Sorry gang...been gone for WMD training...boy was it a "blast"!!  Shocked

Guest from Canada,

We already discussed this, at length, and I don't think she would be putting herself in harms way. She is going to approach it from a "non-adversarial" perspective. Rather than going in screaming "this thing is crap" (which it is), she is simply going to present him with the findings and let him take it from there. He is a good guy, and a very good leader, I don't think she has to worry.

I spoke with an examiner recently, and he realizes that there are false positives and such, but feels it is "worth the price." He feels that it isn't whether the poly is 100%, or even 50% accurate, he said "the value of the poly is in the information obtained from the examinees, be it due to intimidation, belief in the poly's accuracy, etc." The way he sees it, "it scares the hell out people." He realizes it's just a scare tactic and was fairly open about it.

Saidme,

You really should get out more often, I am flattered nonetheless. Maybe you aren't "up to speed" on all my views regarding the polygraph. I do believe there is some benefit and applicability for the poly in criminal matters, just not in SCREENING formats. It's far too flawed, even some pro-poly people admit this. As far as detective work goes, I really don't see that for me...although it's a very important part of LE, it's too boring for me. 

I'd rather be doing the job on the street and teaching others to do the job, no offense to any detectives that may read this. I do find, however, most of them do their job through sound detective work, being out in the field, gathering evidence, forensics, etc., not by simply lining people up and plugging them into a box. They do use the poly when needed. As for what kinds of cases, how often, etc, I really don't know.

I did find out some interesting information. My dept. has 5 full-time poly examiners, 2 strictly for screening, 2 for criminal, 1 that does both. The two "screeners" are both out on leave, 1 for stress, 1 for medical as a result of frequent migraines. I wonder why.  ???

Suethem,

I can only say I'm glad I'm in a position where I have limited contact with them, they're a little bit "different" from REAL cops.  Wink I do occasionally see the examiner I beat up during my poly, I just grin and say hi, all the while I'm thinking "puhleeease." He thinks of himself as being "intimidating", ( he said one time "now that Dale Earnhart is gone, there is only intimidator left"). "Intimidator", yeah, right.  Roll Eyes

Best,
PK
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Almost lost to the "Dark Side"

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X