LieChazer,
You state in part:
Quote:Just as soon as Drew Richardson breaks into a home at night, rapes the sleeping woman, steals her diamond necklace and faces a "real" prison sentence of life without parole, then I will consider his "challenge" and I will guarantee any tongue bitin', butt squeezin', paradise dreamin' will not outweigh his responses to the relevant questions.
What you in effect seem to be saying is that the guilty cannot beat the polygraph when the consequences of being found deceptive are serious. On what basis do you make this claim? You assert that you know this because "everyday, somewhere in the world, someone is being accused of these types of crimes and everyday they legitimately 'pass' or 'fail' without countermeasures." But the foregoing does not in any way support your assertion.
Those new to AntiPolygraph.org may wish to read Dr. Richardson's
polygraph countermeasure challenge and the responses posted thereto to reach their own conclusions as to why none in the polygraph community have thus far mustered the courage to prove their claimed ability to detect countermeasures.
Quote:You can take the chance using countermeasures if you want to...in my view the only good tyhing about the LBTLT is the price. But is it really worth it?
If there is anything in
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (sometimes abbreviated TLBTLD) that you believe to be untrue, unfair, or otherwise misleading, please don't hesitate to point it out. In fact, we have a
forum dedicated to discussion of the book.