Vato,
You started the SF debate with:
Vato
Guest
Re: Polygraph testing; « Reply #3 on: 02/16/03 at 18:48:22 »
“When did you go through SFAS?”
I too, hope this will be my last post regarding this topic as well. Actually, I further hope this will be my last post to you period. The readers on this board are without question, tired of reading this meaningless thread. And quite frankly, I don’t blame them. I’m sick of debating the entire SF saga with you. Let it go. If you don’t believe what I post, fine. Why not contain your personal sarcasm, and simply dismiss the post. Rather, you prefer to respond with personal insults, sarcasm and rudeness, resulting in a continuing response and meaningless never ending thread.
First off; if you would read your on link provided within your previous post, you will clearly read that SFAS is currently a 24 day course:
[Vato wrote]
“If you follow this link to the JFK Special Warfare Center
http://www.soc.mil/swcs/Pipeline.shtml, you'll see that you are clearly in error as to the duration of the SFAS as well as the "Q" course.”
[Copy & paste from your own referenced link]
“Phase I: Special Forces Assessment and Selection (SFAS): 24 days”
The last time I checked, a 24-day course is 3 weeks in duration.
With respect to the SFQC course, 21 years ago, [1982] the basic SFQC course excluding additional MOS skill training [not part of the basic “Q” course] was a three-week basic course. Present day, I suspect it is still close to 3-weeks, although it may have extended in duration over 21 years. Not sure, don’t care.
Unlike you, I’m not going to waste my time searching via “Yahoo” to try and find out. Please understand my position here ese Vato; I don’t really care if its 3-weeks, 3-months, or 3-years. I have already successfully completed the course, and could care less what you think. I’m certain that you will try to impress your avid supporters with your typical “unsupported” response. You blatantly discredit yourself further with each succeeding post. Only this time, be sure and “proof read” your own referenced material for a supporting argument, when suggesting we read your provided link. Ha!
[ese Vato also wrote]
“Maybe you should go back to reading Tom Clancy and Marcinko novels.”
I have never read a single Richard “Dick” Marcinko novel, nor do I like or read Tom Clancy novels. However, I appreciate your recommended source reading material. Do you also recommend the National Enquirer magazine? Sounds to me as though it would be more in-line with your intellect.
[ese Vato again wrote]
“I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions about your stated qualifications.”
I have never stated any of my qualifications on this board. Where do you arrive at this? Again, you are misstating something you did not fully comprehend. You should seriously consider some basic adult reading comprehension improvement classes. Remedial reading education courses for adults are very beneficial, helpful and affordable.
[ese Vato continues to write]
“The members of the Special Forces are called "quiet professionals" for a reason.”
Agreed, and your point is..??
Are you suggesting that my admission to a couple of Army courses over 21 years ago is some type of a threat to National Security, or giving away some type of secret.? It’s not like I’m posting any classified information, or actual “real-world-events”. Be realistic ese, you can do better than that.
Vato, you should quit embarrassing yourself any further. You respond to my post with a referenced link of you own, that supports my very position. You probably found the link you referenced via Yahoo search engine. You tell me to read your referenced link, and it completely supports my argument to within a couple of days.
Vato, you’re an Idiot.
Torpedo:
[You write]
“Vato...I have this feeling thaty you have hit the nail on the head. Triple X (odd name don't you think) seems to enjoy lengthy posts to demonstrate his knowledge about certain topics. “
You point out that my board identity “xxx” is an odd name, agreed. Fair enough, however, I assume “Torpedo” is a far superior board name?
What is your point here Torpedo? Are we now rating board member identities? If you are suggesting it is representative of the movie “XXX”, [some assume it is] I assure you it is not, nor have I viewed the movie. I also received a private message from a board member asking me if I was into xxx porn… again, not so; and has nothing to do with my board identity. Since when is board names an issue.? I simply picked it at random.
Torpedo, you made reference to my post(s) being "lengthy" to appear knowledgeable about certain topics, not the case at all.
I do not consider my post(s) any lengthier than many others on this board, and not as long as some. I simply try to make my point and position clear.
Batman:
You are totally incapable of posting an independent post on your own. You are quick to rally and call out to your supporters such as “Green Lantern (Torpedo) and Vato” just to name a few, to rally behind and pile-on to help support your claim.
You guys get-off on “cyber” high-5’ing each other, in support of one another. batshit, you simply can’t post a single debate without calling-out for “requesting” support from your cronies.
{batshit wrote]
“I called him out on his Special Forces line in a different thread about 2/3 weeks ago.”
When and where do you interpret “calling me out”.? If you’re referring to your previous post regarding your suspicions of me being a “logistics or supply puke”, you have to be kidding… If that’s “calling someone out” in your own mind, then your very weak minded.
[batshit writes again]
“Vato, funny you should tell him to go back to reading Marchinko (I'm probably misspelling his name because I never read his crap), because I told him he was reading too much Marchinko.”
Your correct here batshit, you did spell it wrong. For the record, the correct spelling is Richard “Marcinko”, not [Marchinko] as you suspected. In this rare case, to your defense, you suspected you may have spelled Marcinko wrong; and amazingly, you were correct in your suspicions. Having said that, I have never read any of his books; although I am smart enough to know who he is, what he represents, and how to "properly" spell his name. Its not exactly rocket science, we’re talking about basic elementary spelling.
I thought you polygraph pukes were college degreed and educated in the basic disciplines. However, I laugh at the thought...
[batshit writes yet again]
“I'm convinced he's simply a tag-a-long, or back office puke who maybe sat through the courses to audit them, but never actually went through them.”
batshit, I’m flattered that you put me in the same category with a simple “tag-a-long, or back office puke”.
[batshit says]
“He's a classic example of how a little bit of knowledge and training is just enough to get you killed.”
You may actually be on to something here batshit…
You and your supporters are pathetic. I personally find it appalling that you represent the polygraph community, and possess the ability as a “chart-gazer” to ruin people’s lives and career ambitions.
I sure hope you are better at “guessing” at polygraph chart results, than trying to guess at my previous military experience and background. You don’t have a clue with respect to my past military experience, no more than you have a clue with chart-gazing… Tell us batshit, how do you really do it, do you shake your magic 8-ball, and rely on the answer.?
You disgust and insult most all non-polygraph supporters on this board. And you are singularly incapable of posting without rallying and calling for all your “yes-men” to support your claim to fame, and pile-on..
Try an independent post for once; that would truly amaze me, as well as many others on this board.
Your turn batshit, write your post, be sure to rally all your supporters, and pile-on with your cyber high-5’ing so the rest of us can sit back and be amused… Ha!!!.
Triple_x