AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released

(UTC)

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.

In addition, check out our live chat server.

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › Action Alerts and Announcements › SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released (Read 26518 times)

Marty Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 499 Joined: Sep 27^th, 2002	SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Jan 9^th, 2003 at 9:31pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	David Westerfield's taped polygraph and interrogation was released. It should make for interesting analysis since public availability of these are pretty rare. The SDPD should be given credit for taping everything. This also demonstrates an area where the polygraph, even as a prop, can be effective. George, if you can get the transcript/tape it should make for excellent site library material. CQT test than can be analyzed in detail including issues such as fear of detection vs fear of consequences - a real problem here for using the poly as more than an interrogation prop. It is also being reported that the police told Westerfield that he failed with a 99% probability and that all others that had taken the polygraph had passed. This is standard interrogation technique true or not but is being reported uncritically as fact rather than interrogation technique. It is also clear that Westerfield, an accomplished engineer, had no idea how the polygraph works. That's actually a pretty good control question they used since they had info from a sympathetic ex that he had been violent with her once when drunk. Some of the questions asked are listed. It was interesting to hear some of the questioning - interrogation in action. He did not confess directly but sounds guilty as hell. They had to cut the interrogation off once he suggested getting an attorney. Professional job, IMO. It should also be noted that later, his attorney was in negotiations to tell them where the body was in return for life. [From the S D Union Tribune] The test involved Redden reading Westerfield a series of questions in groups of about 10. The questions included, "Is your first name David?" "During the first 45 years of your life, do you remember hurting anyone when you were drunk or angry?" and "Regarding the disappearance of Danielle van Dam, do you know her whereabouts at this time?" http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20030109-9999_1m9david.html -Marty
	« Last Edit: Jan 10^th, 2003 at 2:21am by Marty »
	Leaf my Philodenrons alone.
	IP Logged

Ray Senior User Offline Posts: 78 Joined: Jan 10^th, 2003	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #1 - Jan 15^th, 2003 at 5:00am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I'm surprised at the lack of discussion regarding the Westerfield polygraph. That may be due to the fact that the case bodes well for polygraph. According to what I've read, several "suspects" in the case were polygraphed. Westerfield failed, everyone else passed. This sounds like more than chance to me. You can quote lab studies all that you want, but these seem like compelling real world results. Also, in reviewing the tapes of the polygraph, I found the examiner to be very professional. He didn't seem anything like the monsters you make examiners out to be. George I'm curious to hear what you have to say about this.


	IP Logged

G Scalabr Global Moderator Offline Posts: 358 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #2 - Jan 15^th, 2003 at 5:27am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: You can quote lab studies all that you want, but these seem like compelling real world results. Even a broken clock is right twice each day. A single anecdote provides hardly a large enough sample size to declare polygraphy reliable. Quote: Also, in reviewing the tapes of the polygraph, I found the examiner to be very professional. He didn't seem anything like the monsters you make examiners out to be. Audiotape has a funny way of making a professional out of anyone (obviously excluding applicant situations where the examiner knows that there will be no chance of the tape ever getting into the hands of the person being "tested").


	WWW IP Logged

Marty Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 499 Joined: Sep 27^th, 2002	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #3 - Jan 15^th, 2003 at 7:05am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: Even a broken clock is right twice each day. A single anecdote provides hardly a large enough sample size to declare polygraphy reliable. It is generally agreed that the polygraph's greatest reliability is in specific incident testing with a naive suspect. We have that in spades here. Even more to the point, we have a control question from interviewing others that is very specific to Westerfield. That reduces the false positive likelihood from exceptionally honest individuals. Still, it's too bad that CQT testing is so ingrained that SDPD missed a great opportunity to do a GKT on Westerfield. (specifics of the home interior, girl's bedroom, etc). Perhaps he would have totally caved and spared the county a ton of money. Quote: Audiotape has a funny way of making a professional out of anyone (obviously excluding applicant situations where the examiner knows that there will be no chance of the tape ever getting into the hands of the person being "tested"). This is true but give SDPD credit for taping the thing. We would all be better off in all departments taped. -Marty

	Leaf my Philodenrons alone.
	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Offline Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #4 - Jan 15^th, 2003 at 10:04am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ray wrote on Jan 15^th, 2003 at 5:00am: I'm surprised at the lack of discussion regarding the Westerfield polygraph. That may be due to the fact that the case bodes well for polygraph. According to what I've read, several "suspects" in the case were polygraphed. Westerfield failed, everyone else passed. This sounds like more than chance to me. You can quote lab studies all that you want, but these seem like compelling real world results. Also, in reviewing the tapes of the polygraph, I found the examiner to be very professional. He didn't seem anything like the monsters you make examiners out to be. George I'm curious to hear what you have to say about this. Ray, I think that the Westerfield tapes provide a very helpful example of a polygraph examination, and are largely confirmatory of that which is contained in Chapter 3 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. The two tapes of special interest with regard to polygraphy are these: "Pre-test" Phase "In-test" and "Post-test" Phases That Westerfield failed the "test" is not indicative of any validity for polygraphy -- a sample size of one is statistically meaningless. In addition, while polygrapher Paul Redden told Westerfield that all others polygraphed about the disappearance of Danielle Van Dam "passed," it is not clear that such is actually the case. It is apparent that Westerfield had not researched polygraphy prior to his "test." Had he done so, he no doubt could have easily picked out the probable-lie "control" questions and might well have beaten the "test" by augmenting his reactions to them, and perhaps deflecting suspicion away from himself. I don't know if "professional" is the right word to describe Paul Redden's administration of the polygraph interrogation of David Westerfield, but I would agree that his conduct was civil throughout. I think that SDPD's commendable practice of recording polygraph (and other) interrogations helps to assure such conduct.

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

Ray Senior User Offline Posts: 78 Joined: Jan 10^th, 2003	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #5 - Jan 16^th, 2003 at 3:52am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: Audiotape has a funny way of making a professional out of anyone (obviously excluding applicant situations where the examiner knows that there will be no chance of the tape ever getting into the hands of the person being "tested"). You scream that all polygraphs should be taped because examiners are often times "cruel" to examinees. Then, when an exam is taped and the examiner is found to have acted in a professional manner you attribute his or her behavior to the presence of a recording device in the room. Are you basing your opinion that most examiners act unprofessionally when conducting an exam on statements provided by individuals who have FAILED a polygraph? What evidence of examiner misconduct do you have other than what bitter examinees have told you? I think the polygraph community has offered proof in the form of these tapes that even when faced with a child murderer, professional conduct is the norm. Quote: That Westerfield failed the "test" is not indicative of any validity for polygraphy -- a sample size of one is statistically meaningless. In addition, while polygrapher Paul Redden told Westerfield that all others polygraphed about the disappearance of Danielle Van Dam "passed," it is not clear that such is actually the case. Actually, the SDPD administered a total of seven polygraphs in the course of this investigation. Both parents and four family friends passed exams. Only Westerfield failed. I think that gives it a bit more "statistical meaning."


	IP Logged

Marty Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 499 Joined: Sep 27^th, 2002	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #6 - Jan 16^th, 2003 at 7:33am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ray wrote on Jan 16^th, 2003 at 3:52am: You scream that all polygraphs should be taped because examiners are often times "cruel" to examinees. Then, when an exam is taped and the examiner is found to have acted in a professional manner you attribute his or her behavior to the presence of a recording device in the room. Are you basing your opinion that most examiners act unprofessionally when conducting an exam on statements provided by individuals who have FAILED a polygraph? Since you, George, and I all believe that taping is a valuable thing why do you suppose there is such resistance in the polygraph community to taping? What would you do if you were examining someone who insisted on taping, perhaps even bringing their own recording device and offering to leave you a copy? I think taping is sometimes resisted by both some examiners and some examinees. People fear being second guessed. It's natural but I think it is far better to have a tape than a she said - he said bitching contest. Give people credit. I applaud the SDPD's taping. -Marty

	Leaf my Philodenrons alone.
	IP Logged

Ray Senior User Offline Posts: 78 Joined: Jan 10^th, 2003	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #7 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 1:30am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: Actually, the SDPD administered a total of seven polygraphs in the course of this investigation. Both parents and four family friends passed exams. Only Westerfield failed. I think that gives it a bit more "statistical meaning." George or any anti-polygraph individual, I'm still waiting on your response to the above quote. The polygraph goes seven for seven in a child murder case. Maybe the polygraph has some validity. This is a real world example of the polygraph at work. How do you dispute this?


	IP Logged

Anonymous Guest	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #8 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 1:59am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ray, I would suspect (assuming the facts have you have presented are correct) that the odds on most probable explanation is that the investigating officer(s) had correctly identified (had strong suspicions relative to other suspects) Westerfield as the guilty subject before the administration of the various exams. The influence of investigative bias is very strong and can lead to either a large number of correct results or a large number of wrong results depending on the nature of that bias. It is for this reason and coupled with the fact that case investigators are generally pretty skilled at identifying guilty parties (leading to a higher percentage of guilty subject polygraph exams than chance would predict) that you and other polygraphers are largely blind to your actual/unassisted error rates in real field cases. You should thank investigators every time you get a yearly job performance rating...


	IP Logged

anonymouse1 Guest	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #9 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 2:44am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ray wrote on Feb 8^th, 2003 at 1:30am: George or any anti-polygraph individual, I'm still waiting on your response to the above quote. The polygraph goes seven for seven in a child murder case. Maybe the polygraph has some validity. This is a real world example of the polygraph at work. How do you dispute this? You are assuming facts not in evidence. There is no proof that the others who were polygraphed passed or failed their respective polys. In all likelihood the interrogator was simply lying to Westerfield in an attempt to extract a confession.


	IP Logged

Ray Senior User Offline Posts: 78 Joined: Jan 10^th, 2003	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #10 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 3:07am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: I would suspect (assuming the facts have you have presented are correct) that the odds on most probable explanation is that the investigating officer(s) had correctly identified (had strong suspicions relative to other suspects) Westerfield as the guilty subject before the administration of the various exams. The influence of investigative bias is very strong and can lead to either a large number of correct results or a large number of wrong results depending on the nature of that bias. anonymous, Did you listen to the tapes? Tell me where on those tapes the examiner shows any bias. If there was any bias, the tapes would reveal it. That's a typical response from your side of the house, "The examiner manipulated the test." That would be easy to prove in this case....so prove it.
	« Last Edit: Feb 8^th, 2003 at 3:26am by Ray »

	IP Logged

Anonymous Guest	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #11 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 3:52am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ray, You make reference to the Westerfield exam and the examination of (I believe) six others. The one link I see to tapes begins with the poly question review with Westerfield (does not contain the other prior portions of the pre-test interview) and continues throughout his in-test phase and interrogation. This (although better than many polygraphers do) is not a complete recording of all that took place with Westerfield and contains no information from the other six you claim to know something about. If you can provide complete information, I will take the time to review the material. Until then, my assessment remains as previously stated...


	IP Logged

Marty Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 499 Joined: Sep 27^th, 2002	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #12 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 4:03am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	It is highly likley Westerfield did in fact fail the poly since, unlike in screening cases, the police had known about past violent events about that Westerfield would and did lie about. That makes for a much better CQT as the control questions are the CQT's Achilles' heel. Extrapolating this to be a validation of screening poly's with assumed PLT based CQT's is more than a stretch. -Marty

	Leaf my Philodenrons alone.
	IP Logged

Seeker Very Senior User Offline "There are only two sins: The first is to interfere with the growth of another human being, and the second is to interfere with one's own growth." Anonymous Posts: 128 Location: Roanoke, VA Joined: Oct 19^th, 2002 Gender:	Re: SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released Reply #13 - Feb 8^th, 2003 at 1:32pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Gentlemen: I do applaud the taping of the Westerfield polygraph by the SDPD. This is behavior that I would prefer to see with ALL polygraph exams across the board - criminal investigative as well as pre-employment screeening. This is absolutely the best insurance for not only the examiners, but the examinees. As for the Westerfield case polygraph, I still cannot make the stretch that because he failed the polygraph exam and was convicted of the crime, then the polygraph is a conclusive and valid measure of deception. There continues to be a huge diferential between polygraph results and either charges or convictions. Case in point: Brian Kelly, of the CIA passed the polygraph, yet the investigation went ahead full force. see thread on this site Case in point: Former mayor is charged with three counts of murder after passing two polygraph examinations. This case can be read at http://www.roanoke.com/roatimes/news/story144110.html If every time someone failed a polygraph the end result was a conviction in a court (in criminal matters, obviously), then the pro-polygraph community could wave their statistics and gain more support for their belief in the practice. However, this is NOT the case. In the real world, the polygraph has shown to be the thing that is paraded in front of the media when it is consistent with the findings of a court, and shamefully hidden when they do not. Also, the Westerfield case addresses the utility of the polygraph - the miniscule debate left remaining after the validity of the polygraph was shown to be a total flop by the NAS report. As for utility, it does in fact have some scintilla amount for which the polygraph community can claim ground. I have no issue with the use of any prop to wade through criminal investigations, but I do have issue if the results of an exam are the basis of an investigation or any other life changing event - as is often the case with prescreening issues. Best, Seeker
	« Last Edit: Feb 8^th, 2003 at 9:49pm by Seeker »

	YIM AIM IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

SDPD Polygraph & Interrogation Tape Released

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.