I did not mean to side-step your question. To answer directly,
no -- I am not concerned that I am "teaching poly CM's [sic] to those who would like to infiltrate the USG to do us harm." As I noted above, it's obvious that double agents have known how to beat the polygraph since well before AntiPolygraph.org went on-line on 18 September 2000.
You write:
Quote:Cut the BS that the "poly has never caught a spy" crap. Too many people who know nothing about polygraph have made this ridiculous statement.
Why don't you enlighten us then? The National Academy of Sciences polygraph review panel was briefed by the CIA polygraph unit, and panel member Katherine Laskey reported that polygraph screening never caught a spy. Does the NAS "know nothing about polygraph?" Ed Curran presided over a polygraph jihad at CIA following Ames' arrest. He couldn't think of a single spy that had been caught by polygraph screening. Does he "know nothing about polygraph?"
Quote:Let's suppose one of Al-Qaida reads this crap and uses it to pass his test.
If you truly belive that
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector is "crap," then why are you concerned that a member of Al-Qaeda might read it and use the information contained therein to pass a polygraph examination?
Quote:He then gets unfettered access to USG offices and kills Americans. I'd love to hear your excuses then. But I'm sure you will have them all lined up won't you George?
No excuses are necessary on our part. We are speaking the truth plainly here, and will continue to sound the alarm until the pseudoscientific fraud of CQT polygraphy is abolished. Those who will have some explaining to do, when and if the scenario you propose unfolds, are the corrupt and/or incompetent U.S. Government officials who have shrugged off the National Academy of Sciences' warning and continue to rely on polygraph screening.