What a BLAST. You sure are correct.

The last week or so the only thing they can do is "character assasination". They have been asked repeatedly to stick to debating pros and cons of the polygraph. Apparently they have not the intelligence to do this and have reverted to spewing libelous rhetoric. They are so dumb they think asphalt is rectum trouble.

Twoblock,

I saved the file to disk and checked it with Norton Antivirus: no virus found.

What is it with the children?

C'mon.....now you are accusing the pro-polygraphers of planting viri?.....isn't that a stretch George et al?

With "magic lantern" (not magic lasso) it would depend on which virus scanner was used. 

"Symantec has gone on the record as saying they would cooperate with the FBI, and give Magic Lantern immunity from detection. Sophos would not. McAfee's position depends on which report you read. " quoted from http://online.securityfocus.com/columnists/44

You have way to much time on your hands.

Wow! Such a wealth of info! I just wanted to find a way to toss another idea into the anti-polygraph/cvsa arena, but not realted to either of the two subject areas in terms of hardware. Incidentally, such 'hardware' typically falls into the novelty gimmickry category. Polygraph 'machines' essentially have not changed in fundamental design such the parlor days of the early 1900s; cvsa 'hardware' essentially is a pile of cobbled-together junk (albeit in nice-looking and expensive packages) whose input purportedly relies upon the victims input, but in reality, does little more than respond to internal circuit noise generated by a microphone input. 
Secondly, not nearly enough attention has been placed upon the polycrap and cvsa operators themselves, who've collectively and individual have been perpetuating a myth for a very long time. The weight of their 'evidence' relies upon a tactic of endlessly repeating vocal claims of veracity without a single shred of 'real' evidence. This is a sound psychological approach that relies upon the idea that if you say something enough times, pretty soon everyone within hearing range begins to believe it to be 'factual'; a tactic employed during the fifties by communists to brainwash western POWs; and employed today by the Chinese.
WRT the 'operators' themselves, not enough can be said against them. They are, without exception, a person or persons, who've acquired a smattering of educational courses in psychology, physiology, sociology, criminal investigation and law, but do not have what it takes to actually be a one of those bonafide professionals. They typically are unable to make a commitment, they are without exception pathological underachievers who didn't do well in any mainstream school but 'polygrapher U'. And lastly, they are persons whose main goal in life is to make as much money as they can for as little actual work as they can get away with, with the added bonus of having the means of torpedoing as many people as they can legally get away with, said bonus whose reward is to stroke their pathetic, self-centered little egos. Have I said enough?  
rfk