Batman wrote on Nov 16
th, 2002 at 5:13pm:
Come on Peach Tree, you can do better than that.
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmno, that one was pretty good. In fact I know it stung, as the length of your retorts is directly related to how deeply I affected you. Judging by this next verbose spewage, I got you good little man.
Quote:A clown like you knows how the game is played. You do a good job of taking your own quotes and redefining them when the cheese gets a bit binding. It's kinda like when George uses the term "naive".
No, not really. My illustration is much closer to the mark. There's no difference between your petty little word games that you used PRECISELY to give the impression that you are not a polygraher when the question was directly asked of you and the cited example of Bill Clinton giving perjurious testimony. I bet you even had the same smug little smile on your face as the Slickster had, didn't you?
Quote:If you want to know the right answer, ask the right question dufuss.
"It depends on what your definition of 'is' is." -Bill Clinton
Quote:That's one of the first rules of a good polygraph examination. Oh yeah, I forgot, there is no such thing as a good polygraph examination according to you, BlockHead, and others.
If by 'others', you actually mean The National Academy of Sciences, Congress, 99% of the US Court systems, the American Medical Association, etc..... then yes, you're correct.
Quote:One other thing, Bill Clinton doesn't have a school of honesty, you should know that!
I see the concept of 'dramatic irony' is lost on you. Oh well, judging from my Instant Messages, many others thought it was a hoot.
Quote:Actually, I'm more a Rush fan myself. You wouldn't be a Democrat would ya?
No, but you're not the first dim-witted polygrapher or polygrapher apologist who has sought to quickly dismiss what I have to say by blindly compartmentalizing me into a demographic they despise (on these boards, there sure seems to be a lot of Democrat hating going on). Such is the way of a small-minded man. When asked to defend their position, they are caught off-balance and seek to hate and villify the opposition rather than actually defend their profession. "Ooo, I don't like what he's saying, he must be one of them Democrats!"
Democrats and Republican alike in Congress refused to be polygraphed. I wonder why?
Quote:Voted for Al Gore, cried like a baby while claiming he got robbed. It would fit your profile. Oh, did I say that, profile? Damn, another one of those BS Law Enforcement concepts. They just keep sneaking out.
You might want to ask for a tuition refund from the Keystone Police Akademy. I bet you were one of the expert profilers running around looking for an angry white mid-30's Southerner carrying an M-16, weren't you?
Quote:Also, what about that service to your country question, you red, white, and blue bleeder you? Does your patriotism really run deep, or do you just pull it out when accusing others of being despots, petty tyrants, and good German soldiers?
An interesting question. It's not the right question though, so try again dufus.
batman then pontificates:
Quote:By the way jerk-off, don't formulate opinions on how one would does his or her job based on what they post on this site.
He then fails to take his own just-recently dispensed edict and writes:
Quote:As for me, I would venture to say that you are very competent at what you do, and well thought of in the work place. It's just that when your fingers start dancing across that keyboard, the jerk in you pushes to the top. It happens, so don't worry about it.
If you can't hang when the questions start hurting, you always have a little hook-rug on the porch, parser.