To all of you who have been branded a liar by government agencies and which brand seems to stay with you, the following seems apparent to me.

1. You have been liabelously slandered.
2. You have a legal right, in the courts, to make the liable 
    perpetrators prove each and every charge of lying.
3. It they can't prove their charges, then they are liable for
   actual and punitive damages.
4. I know of the class action lawsuit filed be Mark Zaid. Does it
   ask for monetary damages? If not, when the suit is won, 
   each should file their own personal action. Nothing gets 
   attention like a lawsuit.
5. Slander encompasses LE as well as others.

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

I am in the mining business and ( for my own protection) have studied federal law, by computer, for four years and still studying. Twice I have, pro se, gone against some pretty good lawyers and won. Working on another.

The reason for the above paragraph is to show that one person can make a difference if that person has the intestinal fortitude to go against that intity which does you wrong. If I had been slandered as you have, the water wouldn't get cold before I hit them with a suit. Jurisprudence, in federal courts, should be about the same whether it's a slander or mining suit.

Fair_Chance

When I go into an opponent's pool hall I pick up the biggest que stick in the place with which to fight. As far as rules go, when you file under a certain authority, your opponent has to play by the rules of stated authority (s). or attempt to have said authority thrown out. That's where a good "Memorandum of Law" helps you stay the course.

If I wasn't to old, I would apply to the FBI, CIA,etc. just so I could the jerk that called me a liar into the court room. You see, I also play by my set of rules which are just as nasty as theirs.