Beech Trees
I am not sure if you finally felt a need to prove you are not a desk bound geek or what caused your latest incident of venting, but Im sure we all admire you.  I do not believe I seriously talk about dangers I have faced, but you on the other hand may feel you need to prove something.  If I have brought up the issue of background, it is because some one that has experience with the polygraph (to me at least) has more credibility when talking about the manner in which it is used.  You have instead taken this to mean that I or others are comparing our courage, character, or worth of profession to yours. I have no idea if you are a lion or a weasel, but I do know that you will borrow a passage from a traitor like Ames (Aftergood letter) rather than provide something original.  What you do lack in experience you make up for in hysteria and that is why people interact with you poorly.  I will just ignore your personal remarks in the last post where you made yourself look like an ass.  If you want a lesson in communication without condescension, see most of fair chances responses or even Mark M's.  As for replying to me, you have nothing I need.
George?
Since we understand that you are the reserve officer who asked to remain anonymous (asked who?) please explain why you felt it necessary to caution me on authorship.  I am who I said I am, as you know.  But how can we believe any testamonial presented here in these circumstances? and why not just be up front?? By the way on this topic, what did the agency fail you for, since it was not a test for espionage.
If you want, I can approach my Sheriff about an honorary commission in the reserves, or maybe the mounted patrol.  Let me know.
Your other site is quite interesting...
Pissing on nettles indeed!