Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) FBI Responds to Request (Read 13872 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box SecondChancePoly
Guest


FBI Responds to Request
Sep 27th, 2002 at 10:24pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Here's a brief synopsis:  I recieved an inconclusive result on my FBI polygraph test several months ago.  I was told that I would recieve a re-test within three weeks.  Two weeks later I recieved a rejection letter from the FBI.  Got online, read the book, wrote a letter to the Director of the FBI claiming that I had not been scheduled for a re-test.  Fast forward several months>>>>> Earlier this week I received a call from the FBI saying that they had recieved my letter and are now ready to give me a retest.  Guess what? I already accepted and have a job in the private sector that pays twice as much with far more promotion potential.  After the way that I have been treated by the FBI, I am going to stick with the company that has treated me so well in such a short period of time.  I would take it just to clear my name but the problem is that I work 70 hours a week.  What do I tell the FBI without sounding like the re-test is a waste of my time, and thiers?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box yankeedog
Senior User
***
Offline



Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 25th, 2002
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #1 - Sep 28th, 2002 at 3:55pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Why not just send them a professional letter explaining that although you appreciate the opportunity to continue in the employment process, you have accepted employment with another company.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6218
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #2 - Sep 28th, 2002 at 4:32pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
SecondChancePoly,

I think yankeedog's suggestion makes a lot of sense. As for clearing your name, you may wish to file a Privacy Act request for your FBI file to find out what admissions (if any) your polygrapher may have attributed to you. (Presumably nothing too serious, otherwise it's unlikely that you'd have been offered a "re-test.")

On the other hand, if you're really concerned about not having an inconclusive polygraph outcome as the last thing in your FBI file, you may wish to just take the necessary time off from work, take the Bureau's asinine "test," and then decline the job offer. (Of course, on the "re-test," there is always a chance that you'll be arbitrarily accused of having employed countermeasures.)
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box SecondChancePoly
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #3 - Sep 28th, 2002 at 8:28pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Thanks guys.  I think I am going to go with yankeedog's suggestion.  By the way, great job on the book.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box guy
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #4 - Oct 1st, 2002 at 11:56pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Hey, I am in the process of appealing my FBI rejection. I am wondering what the exact number of months is when you say "several".

I wrote my first appeal letter five weeks ago, got the poly rejection about two months ago, and took the actual poly in July. 

Based on this when do you think they will realistically get back to me? Did you also write to the recruiting chief or only to the Director? I probably should forward my letters to him. You only sent one letter in total? Did it simply ask for a retest or did it give specific reasons why you felt you were entitled to one? My examiner claimed I would be retested too but a few weeks later I got a kindergarten education level rejection letter. Thanks for your help.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box SecondChancePoly
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #5 - Oct 3rd, 2002 at 3:13am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Guy,

I simply wrote 1(one) letter to the Director explaining that it would be in the FBI's best interest to adhere to their standard of integrity by delivering on their promise to give me a retest.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box guy
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #6 - Oct 6th, 2002 at 1:43am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
so can you tell me how many months exactly it took before the FBI responded? thnks
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box SecondChancePoly
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #7 - Oct 6th, 2002 at 9:42am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Guy,

With two letters from congress and repeated appeals showing no progress, I would rely on your talents.  I thought that I would contribute to my wonderful country's national security, but unfortunatley they rely on voodoo science that WAS WRONG, in my case.  Don't take it to hard, keep your head up.  It's probably God's plan for you.  If you made it to the final round with the FBI like I did, then of course you have several marketable talents, concentrate on those and two years from now, you'll understand why it was in your best interest to let your FBI anger disapate.

Once you look outside of the Federal Law Enforcement Glass, you'll realize that, "if its meant to be, then its meant to be."   

As a final note, in my case, and trust me, its the FBI's loss, because I am a highly successful individual, and thats why I think that they came knocking on my door after one letter.

Post Script: Read The Lie Behind The Lie Detector.  I got my FBI File.  No wonder they were so persistent in getting me back into the employment process.  My polygrapher and PSI agent wrote good things about me.  It was DC that nixed me.  Oh, well.  I suspect that the FBI is having problems retaining recruits!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6218
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #8 - Oct 6th, 2002 at 10:07am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Guy,

I respectfully disagree with SecondChancePoly's fatalistic suggestion that your having been falsely accused of deception by the FBI is "probably God's plan for you." It is instead the predictable result of reliance on a procedure (polygraph screening) that is completely without theoretical basis and has absolutely no validity.

It's time to follow up your unanswered letter with another one. You may wish to reference your earlier letter and enclose a copy of it.

Have you requested release of your FBI file (including polygraph records) to you under the Privacy Act? If not, I strongly suggest you do so promptly.

As I mentioned in another thread, you may also wish to contact attorney Mark Zaid <ZaidMS@aol.com> about possibly joining the ongoing federal polygraph lawsuits that he is litigating. Apart from e-mail, you can also reach him at his new office phone number, (202) 223-9050.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box guy
Guest


Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #9 - Oct 7th, 2002 at 12:56am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Thanks SecondChance. I agree with you. The FBI is over-blown. My letter writing campaign is more about getting my name back than wanting to work for them. McDonalds is a more professional organization. Hell, the cartoons on the back of their happy meal containers are more professionally written than the FBI polygraph rejection letter. Peace.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box steincj
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 103
Joined: Dec 8th, 2002
Gender: Male
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #10 - Dec 8th, 2002 at 3:40am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  


I too am awaiting some sort of reply form the FBI regarding my appeal to my failure.  I don't think that they will be willing to re-test me, though, since my polygrapher accused me of being a spy.

It has only been a month since the FBI recieved my appeal letter, and I'm already out looking for another job (career).  Since my intelligence background and TS clearance is marrerd by this false accusation, I basically have to start over.

But SecondChance, I have to totally disagree with you.  Take a personal day and get back on that machine.  Clear your name, let the FBI get all excited that you will move on in the process, and then write them a letter resigning form the application process, telling them that you don't want to work for an agency with such a lack of integrity.   

That's what I would do, well, if I got a second chance.  And if I had a good job . . .


Chris
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fair Chance
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Joined: Oct 10th, 2002
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #11 - Dec 8th, 2002 at 5:46pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
steincj wrote on Dec 8th, 2002 at 3:40am:



I too am awaiting some sort of reply form the FBI regarding my appeal to my failure.  I don't think that they will be willing to re-test me, though, since my polygrapher accused me of being a spy.

It has only been a month since the FBI recieved my appeal letter, and I'm already out looking for another job (career).  Since my intelligence background and TS clearance is marrerd by this false accusation, I basically have to start over.

But SecondChance, I have to totally disagree with you.  Take a personal day and get back on that machine.  Clear your name, let the FBI get all excited that you will move on in the process, and then write them a letter resigning form the application process, telling them that you don't want to work for an agency with such a lack of integrity.  

That's what I would do, well, if I got a second chance.  And if I had a good job . . .


Chris

Dear Chris,

You are traveling the right path.  The FBI will usually respond within two months if your appeal letter is going to work.  I would follow up with another letter to the same person in the first with a copy of the original enclosed asking about the status of your request.  Do not write to anyone other then the name of the refusal letter until they have stated that they will not give you another test.

Unless you confessed or admitted to the accusations, they are just that, accusations.  The whole situation that you are going through is upsetting to a person who is being completely honest.  Hang in there and give it some more time. I am going on my third test with the FBI.  The first was inconclusive and the second extremely accusatory like yours.  I guess the third will be the tiebreaker.  The prescreening CQT without any investigation or background is a roll of the dice.  It is a shame that they have to drag your name through the mud with a test that even many professional polygraphers have trouble with using it in prescreening.

Regards.
« Last Edit: Dec 8th, 2002 at 6:19pm by Fair Chance »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Skeptic
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 549
Joined: Jun 24th, 2002
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #12 - Dec 8th, 2002 at 9:40pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  

Quote:

Unless you confessed or admitted to the accusations, they are just that, accusations.  The whole situation that you are going through is upsetting to a person who is being completely honest.  Hang in there and give it some more time. I am going on my third test with the FBI.  The first was inconclusive and the second extremely accusatory like yours.  I guess the third will be the tiebreaker.  The prescreening CQT without any investigation or background is a roll of the dice.  It is a shame that they have to drag your name through the mud with a test that even many professional polygraphers have trouble with using it in prescreening.



It's also ridiculous that, were this an accurate determination of truth or falsehood, they would ever give a second test in the first place.  The magical disappearance of a drug problem from one test to another should tell them something!

But then, maybe the stars weren't aligned correctly the first time. Wink

I feel for you guys, and want you to know that all of us who have gone through polygraph sessions and been interrogated for alleged "reactions" know polygraph results have nothing to do with your integrity or truthfulness.

Skeptic
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fair Chance
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Joined: Oct 10th, 2002
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #13 - Dec 8th, 2002 at 11:27pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  

Skeptic wrote on Dec 8th, 2002 at 9:40pm:



It's also ridiculous that, were this an accurate determination of truth or falsehood, they would ever give a second test in the first place.  The magical disappearance of a drug problem from one test to another should tell them something!

But then, maybe the stars weren't aligned correctly the first time. Wink

I feel for you guys, and want you to know that all of us who have gone through polygraph sessions and been interrogated for alleged "reactions" know polygraph results have nothing to do with your integrity or truthfulness.

Skeptic

Dear Skeptic,

Chris was accused of being a spy despite his many years of service in the government (information from another thread).  My second polygraph operator did not like my "breathing pattern."  I was ignorant of polygraph procedures during my first two exams.  I let the polygraph operator know of my knowledge of polygraphs and I did not use countermeasures on my third exam.  Chris nor I were accused of drug usage.  I know The Lie Behind the Lie Detector but I do not think that two negatives equal a positive.  My examiner is not being fully honest with me but I must take the higher ground and be honest with him.  Some one has got to try to stop this madness.  I will know the final results of my polygraph soon.  I have always tried to do my job as faithfully as possible despite the repercussions.  As I stated in my first few posts, I am used to doing the hard thing despite how it might affect my income or career.  I want to look in the mirror every morning and be able to like the person that I see.  It is not heroic.  Sit through "Saving Private Ryan," "Blackhawk Down," and "The Longest Day," that is true heroism.

Regards
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Skeptic
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 549
Joined: Jun 24th, 2002
Re: FBI Responds to Request
Reply #14 - Dec 9th, 2002 at 12:18am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  

Quote:


Dear Skeptic,

Chris was accused of being a spy despite his many years of service in the government (information from another thread).  My second polygraph operator did not like my "breathing pattern."  I was ignorant of polygraph procedures during my first two exams.  I let the polygraph operator know of my knowledge of polygraphs and I did not use countermeasures on my third exam.  Chris nor I were accused of drug usage.  I know The Lie Behind the Lie Detector but I do not think that two negatives equal a positive.  My examiner is not being fully honest with me but I must take the higher ground and be honest with him.  Some one has got to try to stop this madness.  I will know the final results of my polygraph soon.  I have always tried to do my job as faithfully as possible despite the repercussions.  As I stated in my first few posts, I am used to doing the hard thing despite how it might affect my income or career.  I want to look in the mirror every morning and be able to like the person that I see.  It is not heroic.  Sit through "Saving Private Ryan," "Blackhawk Down," and "The Longest Day," that is true heroism.

Regards


Fair Chance,
Your story is very similar to my own.  After two R/I exams in which I received post-test interrogations, I was brought back for a third (one that gave me the impression that they were trying to wash me out).  Only during the third test was I asked about knowledge of countermeasures and research into polygraphy, and I answered all questions honestly (perhaps foolishly so).  My knowledge obviously did not please the polygrapher, who threatened me with dismissal if I used countermeasures.

Having heard nothing for a month and a half (despite repeated attempts at finding out my status) and after my extremely negative polygraph experiences (which i did not relish having to repeat every five years or so), I decided to pursue other avenues of employment.

Skeptic
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FBI Responds to Request

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X