AntiPolygraph.org Message Board

(UTC)

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.

In addition, check out our live chat server.

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › Polygraph Procedure › Lawyers

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

Lawyers (Read 2928 times)

PROAc New User Offline Posts: 22 Joined: Apr 18^th, 2002	Lawyers Jun 7^th, 2002 at 4:31am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Suppose you are on the waiting list for the security review appeal, it is worth to go alone or to have a lawyer? Whom would you recommend: Sheldon Cohen Janine Brookner (ex-CIA who won for sexual harrassment against the CIA) Cacheris (Spelling?) defended Ames, Hanssen, etc BTW, are polygraphers law enforcement officers? They seemed not to know a lot about the laws. Thanks.


	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Offline Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: Lawyers Reply #1 - Jun 7^th, 2002 at 11:16am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	It stands to reason that skilled legal counsel can only help. Whether it is worth it or not is a subjective call you'll have to make. What agency is involved? Whether or not you decide to retain a lawyer, you might find Elizabeth L. Newman's book Security Clearance Law and Procedure to be a useful reference. I don't know which lawyers might be best for such matters, but other names that also come to mind include Mark Zaid and Roy Krieger. As for polygraphers being law enforcement officers, some are, some aren't. To the best of my knowledge, all FBI polygraphers are special agents and are thus law enforcement officers with the power to make arrests. It may be the same with the U.S. Secret Service and DEA. But as far as I know, CIA and NSA polygraphers are not law enforcement officers.

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

PROAc New User Offline Posts: 22 Joined: Apr 18^th, 2002	Re: Lawyers Reply #2 - Jun 15^th, 2002 at 5:30am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Thanks for the other lawyers name. I guess with the hundreds of revoked security clearances after Ames and Hanssen,they are quite busy. Index to Legal Periodicals listed 117 law review articles on polygraphs. Maybe a good idea to list them all on your website. Might be more at Current Law Index. You can get them from Westlaw or Lexis-Nexis. BTW, what was the first case involving polygraph?


	IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Lawyers

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.