This is good news. How did you learn of it?

Thanks. Here's a link to an article in the Philadelphia Daily News:

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/local/3304851.htm 

In the spirit of charity, I offer these helpful links to assist all the newly-unemployed polygraphers in and around the Philadelphia area in finding meaningful work:

[url=http://www.headhunter.net/JobSeeker/Jobs/JobResults.asp?strCrit=QID%3DA3845740028242%3Bst%3Da%3Buse%3DALL%3BrawWords%3Dwaiter%3BCID%3DUS%3BSID%3D%3F%3BTID%


SUP%3DDC%3BFRE%3D30%3BCHL%3DAL%3BQS%3Dsid%5Fckrph01%3BSS%3DNO&ch=AL&lr=c
bcb_pi]Help I've Been Fired Thanks in Part to Antipolygraph.org[/url]

I Lied For a Living, Now I Must Find an Ethical Means of Earning Money

Good luck [former] polygraphers, we hardly knew ye.

Quote:


Whether you're a thief or not is irrelevant to the issue, as polygraphs cannot detect lies about thievery much less anything else. The process itself is bankrupt, therefore gleefully exulting in the fact that polygraphs have been banned from the hiring process so that you, an admitted thief (at least for the purposes of your juvenile post) might be hired is also irrelevant. If the background investigation doesn't uncover your prior transgressions the crucible of being placed in a position of trust surely will. Daily readers of newspapers can clearly see that police officers (and prosecutors and judges) are routinely arrested and convicted for crimes such as drunk driving, drugged driving, hit and run, rape, drug dealing, arson, car theft, burglery, armed robbery, assault and murder-- including cop-killings. Did the polygraph catch any of them? Nope.

Dave