Well good morning, good afternoon, and if I don't see you, good evening to you too Voyeur!
So nice to see that you have been sucked in by my verbal manipulation as well.
In case you don't realize it, my verbal manipulation comes in the form of dialogue that forces--yes, FORCES--those who read it to add their two cents. People just feel, as in your case, that they can't walk away with feeding the inferno of chaos that I create.
Quote:What a lame attempt to turn the tables on AMM. You are the sucker. AMM predicted that you couldn’t resist, and true to form, you responded with a rambling rationalization for your lack of character. You would rather die then let someone else have the last word.
Let me set you straight...you seem to be missing the point:
I had drawn all these suckers into adding their commentary to my initial post. I started this whole string of "marijuana" messages with the initial post I presented on how to pass the drug test. I knew that it would serve as a controversial topic, and considering even you had to ramble off your mouth, I was surely correct.
As I said before,
Quote:Anyone who has taken any time to read my prior posts will know what they are getting themselves into when they partake in a dialogue with me
It was clear from the start that I would always want to have the last word. AMM didn't predict anything...she was well aware of the fact that I would feel obligated to respond.
How can something that is known be predicted? You have made it clear that you are not a person of logic.
Quote:For God's sake, could either you or AMM please come up with one solid argument--written in proper English--for me to ponder? Your tag-team partnership with AMM only proves that you are both worthy of one connected title:
DUMB AND DUMBER!
I stand corrected...
Throwing you into the scenerio yields a connected title of
"Dumb, Dumber, and Dumbest"
My game plays like this: I throw a controversial topic/post into play, and whenever anyone makes any type of response, I consider it a victory for me.
A response from anyone (to my initial post) is representative of the fact that I was successfully able to verbally manipulate them (and draw them in) into feeding my love for chaos.
You are totally illogical and unaware of reality if you claim that anyone has made me the sucker. I am winning at my game, and will only lose when someone allows me to give the last word without them (being verbally manipulated into being forced to have to respond) feeling obligated to respond yet again.
Hence, a response from you to this post yields a victory for me, while no response yields a loss for me (and a victory for all others who have responded to my post).
I have just told you how to beat me at my own game...do you still feel obligated to respond again(?), even though doing so will just prove that I am the king of manipulation?
Quote:Wake up and smell the irony!!!! Here’s a person with chronic diarrhea of the mouth and delusions of grandeur that is so dumb they couldn’t tell an irrelevant from a control or relevant
Let me correct you yet again...
The reason I used countermeasures on irrelevant questions was because the examiner used disguised control questions. As soon as I was aware of that fact, I used countermeasures correctly on only the control questions.
Let me ask you: Do you have the balls to walk in to a polygraph agency with a tack in your shoe placed strategically so that you could walk absolutely normal, yet be able to use it during the exam? Probably not...
I was able to do it two times now because as I said, I am the king of manipulation.
Go ahead...give me another victory. Let's hear what you have to say now.