Post Reply

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 25 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Today at 9:28am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
A 30-page Pretrial Stipulation filed on 27 July 2021 lays out the issues that are to be argued and decided at trial in this case. This document is attached to this post.

The key point that appears to be at issue is whether NITV, LLC., against which the judgment in this case was originally issued, fraudulently transferred assets to avoid paying the judgment debt, and whether Charles Humble, his wife, Lourdes Irimia, and NITV Federal Services are liable for that.

A "Hearing on Defendants' Objections to Request for Production" is set for Tuesday, 3 August 20201 at 8:30 AM before Judge Ashley Zuckerman.

The hearing is to be held via Zoom, a videoconferencing service:

Meeting ID: 94110438096
Password: 208540

+1 8778535257 US Toll-Free
+1 8884754499 US Toll-Free
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 28th, 2021 at 5:41pm
  Mark & Quote
Thank you and your kind reader for the PDF.  Well, it looks like the war between the foe faux docs will be on-going.  Good. 
Charlie is really a piece of work claiming that Gary is too aggressive and greedy, especially after Charlie threatened to destroy the livelihood of Matt Vanderhoff, an IT consultant that wrote some software for Dektor, as well as threatened "sanctions" against AP.  Karma does exist at least in Charlie's case.  Really, Charlie could lose everything, and I would not be surprised to even see his 4th wife (whom appears young enough to be his grand daughter) jump ship.  I have zero mercy for someone that Charlie that has destroyed probably thousands or lives and has dented, or prevented so many criminal justice careers.
I'm thinking that Charlie may realize the gig is up, and he is going down, and wants to take Gary down to Hell with him by continuing to run up litigation expenses.
This comment should probably be in another heading, but one thing I find interesting is that in the VSA side of so-called lie detection, it is the manufacturers that attack each other (CVSA, DVSA, Dektor).  But on the polygraph side, it is the operators that attack each other, for example, the Dr. Phil polygraphists.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 27th, 2021 at 6:07pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
A reader kindly sent a PDF version of Marc Freeman's South Florida Sun-Sentinel article, "Which Company Is Telling the Truth: Battle in Lie-Detecting Industry Is Getting Stranger than Fiction," which I have attached to this post.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 26th, 2021 at 7:16pm
  Mark & Quote
Thanks for the update.  I read as much of the article by Marc Freeman as I could before getting popped out since it is a pay for view piece.  I could only briefly read parts of the article so please forgive me if I am missing some points.
That said, Mr. Freeman would be well served to study AP for an incredible amount of information on the on-going rumble between Baker and Humble.  Also, the Brian Ross ABC interview of "Dr," Humble, especially the longer version should be viewed by Mr. Freeman.
Here are a few points that need to be further examined:
*  If NITV/Humble cannot pay the judgement against them, they probably need to declare bankruptcy.  Gary's lawyers really need to start leaning on Charlie & Co.  Charlie bragged to Brian Ross that NITV "has had a remarkable level of success."  Really Charlie, don't blame your foe faux doc for your failure to pay a settlement.
*  Charlie and Gary need to show their research on VSAs "work" and furnish some empirical data, not a phony baloney Ukraine published article.  Charlie's attempt to explain his "science" to Brian Ross appeared to have backfired.
*  Just because polygraphs are bogus does not mean VSAs are legit.  The research I have found shows they are both 50/50.  The CVSA given to me was, however, 100% inaccurate.
*   Finally, like the purpose of AP, all forms of polygraphs, VSAs and even e-meters need to be gone now.  A bogus CVSA dented my career, but we have former Afghanistan allies that may be murdered by the Taliban because of various charlatans more interested in making money than the welfare of their fellow humans.
I hope Marc Freeman does a series of articles about the fallacy of so-called lie detection.   
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 26th, 2021 at 4:17pm
  Mark & Quote
Marc Freeman writes about the ongoing civil litigation between Gary Baker and Charles Humble in an article titled, "Who’s telling the truth? Battle over lie-detecting is stranger than fiction," published in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Excerpt:


Endless litigation

The feuding began in 2003, when Humble’s original company, NITV, LLC, sued Baker in federal court for false advertising and unfair competition. The following year, NITV sued Baker for a second time, but by early 2005 the parties had agreed to a settlement.

The peace was temporary. That same year Baker sued NITV for defamation, this time in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. He accused NITV of sending out “Scam Alert” notices to police departments around the country warning about Baker’s product.

A jury sided with Baker, and in 2011, a state appeals court agreed Baker was entitled to a $250,000 award for damage to his reputation. The trial judge later approved that judgment plus interest.

But Baker says he still hasn’t seen any money. Scott W. Zappolo, attorney for Baker, said he is now asking a new judge to order Humble’s company to pay out over $400,000, including the interest amount.

Humble’s attorney, William A. Fleck, could not be reached for comment despite attempts by email and calls to his office.

But Humble explained that his original NITV company lost too much business over false attacks by Baker and his partner, making it unable to pay the judgment.

“They killed the cow they are going after,” Humble said, blaming the defamation on a former employee.

On top of that dispute, in 2015 Humble sued Baker and a partner, accusing them of doing illegal international business in Central America and other places. Baker denies the allegations.

Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 23rd, 2021 at 12:30am
  Mark & Quote
Also, when I step back from all the Charlie and Gary drama, I cannot stop thinking how this ongoing legal action would make one heck of a news story.
We got to principals, without principles, preaching the fake gospel of truth and therefore integrity.  But wait, both these actors have fake Ph.D's to dishonestly boast their reputations.  Both Gary and Charlie have even posted on Anti-Polygraph by referring to themselves as doctorate level individuals.  Gary evidently emailed this site personally, whereas Charlie had his lawyer sent a letter to AP and said letter referred to Charlie as Dr. Humble two times.
When Charlie "won" his case against no show pro se Dektor, he immediately gave a short deadline of, if I remember right,  four days for the opposing IT consultant to cough up the software.  Even AP was given a short deadline to "comply."  Although it has been over two years since that infamous cease and desist letter, I am still scratching my head wondering why a presumed competent attorney would send such a dumb ass letter.  Maybe a quick and dirty immediate payoff of a few hundred dollars? 
The Brian Ross Charles Humble interview on YouTube would be a good starting point for a reporter, throw in the Charlie/Gary legal drama, maybe interview some of the bureaucrats that contracted with either Charlie and Gary on why they did not do due diligence on VSA's or at least do some cursory research on Google to see how VSAs and polygraphs are pseudoscience nonsense before wasting thousands of taxpayer dollars and then maybe interview some of us that have been wronged by this pseudoscience.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 23rd, 2021 at 12:05am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Not a surprise that the mediation session ended in an impasse.  It appears that Charlie is continuing his strategy of stone walling.  With all of Charlie's LLCs - trying to actually recover the judgement will be like a legal version of whack a mole for Gary's attorneys.  Charlie probably hid some money in his minor son's accounts, maybe some in his wife's so-called real estate company, some in some of his LLC's, who's to say?
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 22nd, 2021 at 7:40pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote

The mediation session held on 20 July ended in impasse.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 22nd, 2021 at 7:30pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Upon further reflection, and some on-line research, I now believe the mediation is to agree on a financial settlement.  Reportedly, Gary only makes between $25,000 to $35,000 a year and it true, wants some money in his pocket as soon as possible. 
Now, Charlie could be very rich, or he could be very poor and leading a fake rich lifestyle.  The revenues at NITV have reported been flat for several years at approximately 1.5 million a year so the company could just be treading water.  Also, Charlie is reportedly on his fourth wife and ex-wives can be expensive or so I have been told.  Let alone, Charlie's toys are a major expense as well as frequent lawsuits.  Charlie appears to be a big spender with no financial discipline. 
Basically, I believe the only thing Charlie and Gary can agree on is how much they hate AP since AP is blowing gaping holes into the make believe science of voice stress analysis.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 9th, 2021 at 5:34pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I still maintain that Charlie and his band of pseudo-scientists are playing Gary and his lawyers like weakling fools.  Let me expand.  When Charlie got his "victory" over no-show Dektor, he immediately demanded that no more derogatory information be spread about NITV or Charlie himself.  Dang, he even threatened the IT consultant of Dektor and Anti-Polygraph. 
Also, when Crowe's parents threated to take NITV to court, Charlie settled in a heart beat.  He knew the Crowe family wasn't playing.
I can only imagine the nick names that the Doc Humble liar crew are calling Gary.  One that comes to mind is "Not so scary Gary the fairy."
Granted, I don't have the whole story of this long running litigation, but maybe there is a code of dishonor among faux Ph.Ds.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 8th, 2021 at 10:04am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Anthony R,

My example of an agreed upon amount being placed into an escrow account would not be for the purpose of paying the mediator's fees, but rather of ensuring performance on the judgment debt. Note also that mediation is not the same as binding arbitration.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 7th, 2021 at 5:05pm
  Mark & Quote
Yes, I would expect both parties to pay to play.  However, I was under the impression that mediation was in lieu of litigation, not after successful litigation that was in favor of Gary.
With that said, Charlie, I bet, will still find ways to drag his feet, further increasing legal costs for both parties.  I hope this scenario continues to play out.  So called lie detection should have been banished decades ago, and I would rather the moronic pair of Charlie and Gary continue to bankrupt each other with never ending legal costs than us concerned citizens get further involved with the lie of lie detection.
I kind of believe that Charlie thinks since he did not collect on Dektor that he has the right not to pay out a settlement to Gary.  But in the legal system, that of course does not matter.
I continue to maintain my position that Gary is an idiot to go to binding mitigation when he already has a lawsuit win in his favor, and that Charlie is continuing to hide assets in his many shell organizations.  The biggest idiots are the government bureaucrats that continue to contract with the crooks in the so-called lie detector business.  Haven't these bureaucrats ever heard of a Google search?
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 6th, 2021 at 4:30am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
If Charlie can ignore to an court order to pay $575,000, what is to keep him from adhering to resolution?

A mediated settlement could, for example, be contingent upon payment of an agreed upon amount to an escrow account.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: Jul 6th, 2021 at 1:59am
  Mark & Quote
Perhaps Gary Baker is not very bright even by faux Ph.D. standards.  Let's stop and and do a brief review of this case.  Charlie lost the case to Gary concerning defamation to the tune of $575,000 approximately 10 years ago.  Charlie apparently did not attempt to make restitution to Gary and has appears to be getting away with stonewalling.
Now here is the part I am having a hard part understanding:  If Charlie can ignore to an court order to pay $575,000, what is to keep him from adhering to resolution?  One cannot make an honorable agreement with an un-honorable individual like Charlie.
I am no where close to being an attorney, but if I was Gary I would start the procedure of seizing Charlie's assets.  Maybe if Gary had a helicopter, kitchenware, photography equipment and guitars he too could be a renaissance man.
On a slightly different point:  Matrix, according to their website, has an option called Black Box where the proceedings are kept hush hush.  Perhaps Gary and Charlie don't want any additional members of the judiciary (game theory?) to see how bogus the whole field of voice stress analysis is.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 5th, 2021 at 3:47pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
In the face of NITV's stonewalling in this litigation, E. Gary Baker filed a Motion to Compel on 23 June 2021. With this motion filed and depositions of NITV employees Olga Kane and Carol Graham looming, the parties have agreed to enter mediation talks on Tuesday, 20 July 2021 via Zoom, under the auspices of Matrix Mediation, LLC of West Palm Beach.

Copies of the Motion to Compel and Notice of Mediation are attached.
Posted by: Anthony R
Posted on: May 3rd, 2021 at 4:28pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Is "Doc" Humble still sick with Covid 19, or was he ever stricken with Covid?  This could be a ploy to allow him to hide assets.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Mar 14th, 2021 at 7:00pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
On 3 March 2021, the parties to this long-running litigation filed a joint motion for continuance. Trial had been scheduled for the time period of 22 March-30 April 2021. Following a hearing, the court on 10 March 2021 issued an order rescheduling the hearing for the time period from 9 August-17 September 2021. Copies of the motion and order are attached.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Feb 20th, 2021 at 9:30am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
In a "Defendant and Third Party Defendants' Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline," filed on 18 February 2021, counsel for NITV Federal Services, LLC, Lourdes Irimia, James Kane, and Charles Humble writes:

... The extension is necessary to continue to take discovery and one or two additonal depositions in preparation for the upcoming trial. Additionally, it was only learned today, February 18, 2021, that Third Party Defendant, CHARLES HUMBLE, was tested positive for CoVid19 and the results reported on February 11, 2021, therefore, his involvement in the case will be limited until he is cleared. ...

A PDF copy of the motion is attached.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 29th, 2021 at 12:14pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
James Kane has been scheduled for a videotaped deposition in this case on 24 February 2021. The scheduling notice is attached.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 18th, 2021 at 3:17pm
  Mark & Quote
The deposition of NITV Federal Services LLC in this case has now been rescheduled for 18 February 2021. The scheduling notice is attached.

One of the topics to be explored is NITV's finances. In this regard, the website indicates that on 1 May 2020, NITV Federal Services, LLC was approved for a $68,933 Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan, reportedly making possible the retention of 6 jobs. notes, "Based on standard PPP eligibility rules, Nitv Federal Services, LLC's total 2019 payroll expenses were approximately $330,878 in order to qualify for the PPP loan amount received."

Data provided by NITV in a different, federal lawsuit indicates that in 2018, NITV had revenue of $1,704,098.

A PDF printout of the information is also attached.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Dec 24th, 2020 at 9:49am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
The deposition that was to take place on 12 November 2020 was postponed until 17 December 2020. However, no deposition took place on that date, and a new deposition date has not been published on the court website. The notice of postponement is attached.

The numerous filings in this case can be browsed on line here:

You can enter as a guest, and then search for Case Number 50-2005-CA-001771-XXXX-MB.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Sep 21st, 2020 at 11:13am
  Mark & Quote
Elwood Gary Baker is still trying to collect the judgment debt owed to him by NITV. On Wednesday, 16 September 2020, Baker's counsel, Scott W. Zappolo, served NITV with the attached "Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of NITV, LLC."

The notice states that for the deposition, which is to take place at 10 AM on Thursday, 12 November 2020, "NITV, LLC...shall designate a person to testify on its behalf and bind said company as to the assets of NITV, LLC at the time judgment was entered in this matter and where those assets are located at this time."

The notice names NITV Federal Services, LLC, Lourdes Irimia (Charles Humble's wife), James Kane, and Charles Humble as third party defendants.

The deposition should be interesting.

It has been suggested to me that some of NITV's assets might be hidden under Voice Biometrics, LLC, a shell company that owns several trademarks associated with NITV.

Judge Glenn D. Kelley has scheduled a jury trial in Baker's collection action for the period between 22 March and 30 April 2021. His scheduling order dated 20 August 2020 is also attached.
Posted by: James K.
Posted on: Jan 5th, 2019 at 2:03pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Come visit us at our 2019 CVSA AEC Conference in Orlando.  Our instructors include everyone's favorite liar, Bill Endler.  Former Sgt. Jerry Crotty will also be there.  We will be showing off our CVSA III, which is nothing more than our CVSA III running on windows 10.
Posted by: Sterling A.
Posted on: Dec 1st, 2018 at 11:36am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Looks like the website was posted wrong.  Here it is again.
Posted by: Sterling A.
Posted on: Dec 1st, 2018 at 11:33am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Apparently NITV has been busy doing a lot of stuff as listed on the following website ;  Shocked