| AntiPolygraph.org Message Board | |
|
Polygraph and CVSA Forums >> Polygraph Procedure >> Countermeasure considerations for the innocent
https://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=989024285 Message started by Gordon H. Barland on May 5th, 2001 at 3:58am |
|
|
Title: Re: Countermeasure considerations for the innocent Post by Gordon H. Barland on May 13th, 2001 at 1:12pm
False + (5/09/01 at 16:59:14) wrote:
Quote:
1. I won't second guess what conclusions they will reach or how they express them. They have world class reputations. I'm confident they will take a fresh look at the data and the issues within the scientific literature. I do not know to what extent they will solicit information from the polygraph community, observe real world examinations, etc. I do not know how they will weigh or resolve the various conflicting data and viewpoints. I will be rather surprised if they don't contribute some fresh insights to the literature. Anything new they have to say will benefit society. 2. Of course it will affect my knowledge of the polygraph. I strive to be open minded and incorporate all new information into the way I view the polygraph. Would I reverse my views if they conclude it doesn't work better than chance? Not unless they make a far more persuasive case than the critics have thus far; there is just too much evidence that it works far better than chance. 3. The false positive rate varies from one type of exam to another. It is probably lower in security screening than it is in criminal investigation, and vice versa. Certainly, some who claim they were false positives, are lying. Others are not. I don't pretend to know what the ratio is. I'm sure there are many variables affect it. One is how one defines an error. This is a variable seldom discussed, but I'm convinced it is an important one and worthy of serious discussion. Peace. |
|
AntiPolygraph.org Message Board » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |