Oh Heck, I'll chime in on this one.  Any polygraph examiner who would administer an exam to a woman who is 8 months pregnant, on a non-life or death situation, would have to be an idiot.  (Beech, you may respond with, "All polygraph examiners are idiots." )

The original question was, "What, if any, would the harm be in her taking this test?".  From a physical standpoint, probably no harm, if her prenancy has had no complications.  From a polygraph standpoint, well, how would the examiner interpret a response that the examinee claims occurred because her soon to be born NFL player just kicked a 50 yard field goal into her kidney?  (George, you may respond with a question, "How would an Examiner know what causes any response seen on a polygraph exam?")

In this particular situation, the right call was made by the agency administering polygraphs, even if it was a year ago.  Three points to them.

George, do you post these old ones just to "stimulate debate", or is it because no one new has been dropping in lately?

Batman

Batman