wrote on Sep 1^st, 2001 at 12:14am:

As for attacking anyone, I wasn't aware I was doing that.  I merely expressed an opinion regarding the manner in which some information was presented.  I must say that wannabe's post does read like an attack to me, but I probably should have expected that from reading his previous posts and those of Fred F.    Regarding being a polygraph examiner, I am not.  I am a Forensic Psychologist.  I have a personal interest in psychophysiology and thus interest in polygraphy, but thats the extent of it.  I do find it interesting that anyone who expresses any opinion that deviates even slightly from the crusade to abolish the evil polygraph is immediately branded an examiner.

Options Open on Posting,

I never mentioned in my post anything to the extent of "labeling" you a polygrapher, I am not posting attacks, only challenges to those who won't respond to Mr. Maschkes requests for documented scientific validity for polygraph testing.

As a Forensic Psychologist you know the value of validity in any scientific research... Your profession requires a great deal of research and investigation, therefore you know that you better have the research to back your findings or they won't hold up as evidence in court.

If you interpreted my posting as a personal attack, Please don't. Like wannabe, I welcome your input and insight to this message board.


Fred F.  ;)