quickfix wrote on Jun 8^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

yes, I am, and yes I and others in my profession do have an open mind.  But when one engages in CMs, he/she is engaging in moral misconduct (for lack of a better term).  Its' one thing to attempt CMs in order to try to hide a deceptive result.  It's a completely different thing to engage in CMs to "help oneself".  The vast majority of three-letter agency employees/applicants do not attempt to "help themselves".  Those who do are telling us, "I will cheat if it helps me", even if they've done no wrong.  It shows a clear lack of integrity.  What else will they cheat at?  Violating a suspect's rights?  Falsifying an agent's report?  These are the types of applicants who are in the 10-50% you refer to.  Closer to 10% than 50%, but regardless of the percentage, lack of moral character is every bit a disqualifier as one who is deceptive to the relevant issues.  I don't want someone like this guarding our nations secrets or protecting our borders.  Do you?

ASS CLOWN, he was autogenic breathing to calm down his nervousness AS THE RECRUITER TOLD HIM TO.

It's NORMAL.

He wanted to appear non combative/argumentative when challenged by the polographer and told him what he wanted to hear, as any good natured person would do in the situation.

It's their house, be respectful, as should YOU.

Golden sticker keyboard warrior. I bet you're a punk in real life who asserts their "superiority" over others on this forum. Real tough guy. I'm not impressed. >:(