Ray, do you or do you not support a bill of rights for polygraph examinees?

Also, my study merely showed what *can* happen under optimal circumstances. It should not be construed as what *will* happen.

As for a countermeasure challlenge series, doing it your way means the randomness of examiner selection that happens in real life can't be achieved, rendering the method useless.

Polygraph's absolute accuracy is unknown and is unknowable.

People should be made aware of that.

It's a virtual racket, with precious little protection for the consumer.

People ought to know that too.

But that would be bad for business, so such "informed consent" will never be embraced by the industry -- and therein lies the polygraph hu$tle.