Dan Mangan wrote on Jul 1^st, 2015 at 10:51pm:

Joe, the examinee bill of rights would help protect people from being hu$tled into the bullshit scientific "test." Polygraph's absolute accuracy is unknown, and, in fact, is unknowable. It's just a SWAG -- a Scientific Wild-Ass Guess, to quote retired CIA polygraph operator John Sullivan.

Ok, lets look at that argument.

the examinee bill of rights would help protect people from being hu$tled into the bullshit scientific "test."

Using your logic, you want a bill of rights to protect an examinee from being hustled while they are being hustled?

If it's a "bullshit test," then the examinee has already been hustled.

With this logic, why would you continue to run tests?