Ex Member wrote on Jul 1^st, 2015 at 10:32pm:

wrote on Jun 30th, 2015 at 10:12pm: Mr. Mangan's career is not in jeopardy and I suspect that his oft-articulate spin will be welcome to some. Ray, I'm not so concerned about personality traits, but, I would like to hear your take on Dan's idea of a Bill of Rights for Polygraph examinees.

A "bill of rights" means nothing when it addresses a test that the examiner wouldn't use for himself if he/she found him/herself in a similar situation.

Otherwise, it is a bill or rights based on a lie; it's a lie to sell a lie in that context.  If the implied contract of accuracy and reliability mean nothing, why would anyone think that a "bill or rights" has any meaning.

Jesus, for the love of God, would someone stand up for our accuracy rates.  There must be someone that trusts the studies the way I do/want to