The voluntary poly was intended to help me exonerate myself. The results are protected by attorney-client privilege and cannot be used AGAINST me (even if I failed). However, this was the only tool I had in my defense, since there were no other realistic ways to prove that I DIDN'T engage in the activity that I'm accused of. Since this is probation and not a new charge, the burden of proof lies with me.

He didn't intentionally direct me here, but during the post-test interview he asked if I had been visiting "antipolygraph" or any other polygraph sites.

He did say that there were 4 different possible outcomes, mentioning "no opinion" as a completely separate outcome as "inconclusive". He specifically said that it was not "inconclusive".

Unfortunately, this happened in the most harsh county in Texas, where alcohol-related crimes are as bad as child molestation or illegal narcotics.