Well let's see here.  YOU think he was wrong. HE thinks he was right.

So I'll have to make a judgement on who I choose to believe.

Since you literally "Wrote the book" that attempts to justify lying and cheating if one thinks it might help them get a job with the government, why should anyone believe you when you claim you didn't lie or cheat in an attempt to get a job with the government?  

I choose to believe the guy who DID NOT write the book that attempts to justify lying and cheating if they think it might help them get a job with the government.

FBI policy indicates that you would have received a retest if upon review of your charts the reviewer had disagreed with Agent Trimarcos findings. All charts are reviewed. Thus it is reasonable to infer that Agent Trimarco analysis of your charts was confirmed. On your second polygraph, when the examiner discovered evidence of countermeasures I'm betting he had his analysis reviewed and confrimed by his supervisor as well.

It astounds me that you can promote lying and cheating as a justifiable behavior and still act offended when someone doesn't believe you.

Sancho Panza