nopolycop wrote on Apr 21^st, 2008 at 8:40pm:

LOL.  Getting a truthful answer out of Sackett is like, well, there is nothing to compare it with, because we have never gotten a truthful answer out of Sackett.

It's also like waiting for any polygrapher to admit that their claims shouldn't be taken on faith but only on grounds of reason after considering the arguments.  But, of course, they can't do that: they do expect people to accept the Polygraph as a matter of faith, not of reason.  

It wouldn't even occur to one of them to make a reasoned argument free of logical fallacies in favor of the polygraph.